2008
DOI: 10.1002/elan.200704066
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Response Mechanism of Ion‐Selective Electrodes Based on a Guanidine Ionophore: An Apparently ‘Two‐Thirds Nernstian’ Response Slope

Abstract: While ion-selective electrodes (ISEs) based on anion ionophores with guanidine groups were reported in the past, their response mechanism was poorly understood. In this study, an ionophore with one guanidine group was prepared as a model compound, and the chloride and sulfate responses of ISE membranes containing this ionophore were investigated. The electrodes exhibit Nernstian responses resulting from a neutral or charged ionophore mode when added cationic or anionic sites are used, respectively. Based on th… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
12
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
1
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Such receptors often use guanidinium, amide, or urea functional groups (or their thio derivatives) as hydrogen bond donors to bind the anion of interest. , To enhance the hydrogen bond donor strength of these groups by increasing the partial positive charge on their hydrogens, these receptors are often substituted with electron-withdrawing groups that also make these receptors more acidic. This leads to the possibility of deprotonation rather than complex formation. , As shown previously in the literature, the straightforward identification of deprotonation in such systems is somewhat complicated because the titration plot of a deprotonation reaction can be satisfactorily fitted using a 1:1 association model, which can easily lead to erroneous conclusions. Therefore, one has to be careful and may have to rely upon a second, complementary technique to identify the occurrence of deprotonation.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Such receptors often use guanidinium, amide, or urea functional groups (or their thio derivatives) as hydrogen bond donors to bind the anion of interest. , To enhance the hydrogen bond donor strength of these groups by increasing the partial positive charge on their hydrogens, these receptors are often substituted with electron-withdrawing groups that also make these receptors more acidic. This leads to the possibility of deprotonation rather than complex formation. , As shown previously in the literature, the straightforward identification of deprotonation in such systems is somewhat complicated because the titration plot of a deprotonation reaction can be satisfactorily fitted using a 1:1 association model, which can easily lead to erroneous conclusions. Therefore, one has to be careful and may have to rely upon a second, complementary technique to identify the occurrence of deprotonation.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…1821 Another example illustrating an increased level of complexity is given by the apparently non-Nernstian response observed when a primary and an interfering ion form complexes of different stoichiometries and co-exist in the ISE membrane over a wide activity range. 2226 This can result, for instance, in apparently half-, two thirds-, and twice-Nernstian responses. Note that in neither of these examples the experimentally observed ionophore forms more than one type of complex with any type of sample ion.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Generally, the NH hydrogen-bond donors employed in anion receptors are based on amines, guanidinium cations, pyrroles, ureas, and amides. Although routinely exploited in the fabrication of anion-selective sensors, , some of the NH donors can become protonated, which might affect the selectivity of the electrode at various pHs. Furthermore, several NH-based ionophores experience aggregation and competition for hydrogen bond donor sites …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%