Response modification factor evaluation for vertically irregular MRF buildings

Abstract

Most design codes assume the nonlinear seismic performance of structures using response reduction/modification factor (R). The R factor is sensitive to a variety of factors in terms of overall ductility and over-strength. This research assesses the actual R factor for vertical irregularity cases for RC bare buildings with moment-resisting frames (MRF) systems. Also, this research derives a significant relationship between R values and identified vertical irregularity index calculated from relative stiffness between adjacent stories. Three-dimensional numerical models are carried out for the soft story and setback irregularity scenarios using ETABS. Modal pushover analysis (MPA) is selected to obtain the inelastic seismic capacity. The obtained results demonstrate that vertical irregular buildings have weak inelastic seismic capacities compared to regular one. So, the response modification factor (R) should be scaled down before the design stage by 15% to 40% for single and combined vertical irregularity scenarios. Structures with a combined asymmetric setback with a soft ground story experience the worst R factor. Also, R factors are sensitive to the identified vertical irregularity index (Vtm) that has 80% regression percent. So, it may be used to specify the allowable vertical irregularity ratio, location, and combination for each seismic zone.

Response Reduction Factor for Structures with Significant Irregularities on Different Soil Stratum

“…The lowest R values were determined for constructions with a loose ground story and a coupled asymmetric setback. Additionally, R's sensitivity to the vertical irregularity index (Vtm) was found to have an R-squared value of 80%, as demonstrated by Ahmed et al [15]. Moreover, this article addresses the impact of SSI.…”