55th AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics, and Materials Conference 2014
DOI: 10.2514/6.2014-0148
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Response of a Panel to Shock Impingement: Modeling and Comparison with Experiments

Abstract: A preliminary assessment is developed for long time record modeling and simulation of coupled flow-structural response of thin-gauge panels subject to shock impingements. The study is based on a set of recent discovery experiments carried out by the Air Force Research Laboratory. The fluid loads are modeled using a CFD surrogate for the steady surface pressure combined with engineering level approximations for unsteady pressure fluctuations due to panel vibration and boundary layer turbulence. The structure is… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 26 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Panel response was drastically changed in comparison to the no-shock case and, depending on the shock position, the maximum amplitude of the panel deformation was significantly increased. Numerical results by [21,22] suggest that while good agreement on mean quantities was achieved it is crucial for the prediction of the dynamics of the coupled system to take into account the intrinsic unsteadiness of SWBLI. FSI experiments with SWBLI with a different focus were conducted by [5,6].…”
Section: Fsi and Swblimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Panel response was drastically changed in comparison to the no-shock case and, depending on the shock position, the maximum amplitude of the panel deformation was significantly increased. Numerical results by [21,22] suggest that while good agreement on mean quantities was achieved it is crucial for the prediction of the dynamics of the coupled system to take into account the intrinsic unsteadiness of SWBLI. FSI experiments with SWBLI with a different focus were conducted by [5,6].…”
Section: Fsi and Swblimentioning
confidence: 99%