1969
DOI: 10.3181/00379727-131-34119
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Response of a "Resistant" Plasmacytoma to Alkylating Agents and X-Ray in Combination with the "Excision Repair Inhibitors Caffeine and Chloroquine

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
14
1

Year Published

1970
1970
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 58 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
14
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Multiple studies have been published indicating that genetic or pharmacological interference with autophagy can enhance the response to radiation (for example, Gaudin and Yielding, 1969;Pazmino and Yuhas, 1974;Zhao et al, 2005;Apel et al, 2008;Livesey et al, 2009;Solomon and Lee, 2009;Jiang et al, 2010;Chaachouay et al, 2011;Bristol et al, 2012;Lim et al, 2012;Wilson et al, 2011). In contrast, our studies indicate that 4T1 cells could not be sensitized to radiation in vitro by pharmacological inhibition of autophagy with chloroquine treatment, by silencing of the autophagyrelated gene Atg12, or by chloroquine in vivo.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 53%
“…Multiple studies have been published indicating that genetic or pharmacological interference with autophagy can enhance the response to radiation (for example, Gaudin and Yielding, 1969;Pazmino and Yuhas, 1974;Zhao et al, 2005;Apel et al, 2008;Livesey et al, 2009;Solomon and Lee, 2009;Jiang et al, 2010;Chaachouay et al, 2011;Bristol et al, 2012;Lim et al, 2012;Wilson et al, 2011). In contrast, our studies indicate that 4T1 cells could not be sensitized to radiation in vitro by pharmacological inhibition of autophagy with chloroquine treatment, by silencing of the autophagyrelated gene Atg12, or by chloroquine in vivo.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 53%
“…SCEs have been frequently used as highly sensitive indicators of DNA damage and/or subsequent repair. The ability to excise and repair various types of damage to DNA is probably a general property of living cells [17]. Unrepaired damage, expressed as SCEs, in normal cells caused by certain chemicals may indicate inability for repair of damage induced by the same chemicals in cancer cells.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It must be emphasized that rodent assays may be confusing in testing these premises because of their reduced ability to excise the relevant damage. Nevertheless, in vivo rodent assays using caffeine have already shown some "beneficial" sensitization (Gaudin & Yielding, 1969;Cohen, 1972;Cohen & Carbone, 1972), though this is to be expected from the enhanced sensitivity of excision-deficient rodent DNA repair pathways. Even human tumours in athymic mice probably cannot be used to determine therapeutic usefulness, since the dose-limiting normal rodent tissues would be expected to be more sensitive than the repair-competent human tumour target cells.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%