2019
DOI: 10.1071/wf18133
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Response of Arizona cypress (Hesperocyparis arizonica) to the Horseshoe Two Megafire in a south-eastern Arizona Sky Island mountain range

Abstract: We examined the response of Arizona cypress (Hesperocyparis arizonica) to the 2011 Horseshoe Two Megafire in the Chiricahua Mountains, Arizona, USA. We documented cover type, fire severity, cypress mortality and seedling establishment in 60 plots. In plots subject to severe fire, most mature cypresses were killed, the canopy opened and seedlings established abundantly. These results were consistent across three canyons differing in topography and vegetation. Successful regeneration of Arizona cypress contrasts… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Of those studies that specified size thresholds for megafires, the most commonly used threshold was ≥ 10,000 ha (41%, 18/44) (Figure 3). The second most commonly specified size thresholds were in the 10,001–50,000 ha range (Figure 3), specified in 32% (14/44) of definitions (e.g., Anthony et al., 2021; Barton & Poulos, 2019; Maezumi et al., 2018). The lowest thresholds identified were 100 ha (Fidelis et al., 2018) and 500 ha (Alló & Loureiro, 2020; Mancini et al., 2017).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Of those studies that specified size thresholds for megafires, the most commonly used threshold was ≥ 10,000 ha (41%, 18/44) (Figure 3). The second most commonly specified size thresholds were in the 10,001–50,000 ha range (Figure 3), specified in 32% (14/44) of definitions (e.g., Anthony et al., 2021; Barton & Poulos, 2019; Maezumi et al., 2018). The lowest thresholds identified were 100 ha (Fidelis et al., 2018) and 500 ha (Alló & Loureiro, 2020; Mancini et al., 2017).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…12-17 Woody plants were often negatively affected by fire, whereas grasses and forb species often experienced post-fire increases in abundance. 13,18 However, rapid-reproducing woody species fared better following fire than poor recruiters, 15,16 and some perennial grasses that invested heavily in above ground compared with below ground production did not respond well to fire. 12 Negative responses to fire were further exacerbated by low soil nutrient 19 and water availability 20 conditions.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Successful xerophytic plants in the post-fire environment could serve as nurse plants for promoting piñon pine regeneration success in the coming decades. For example, Barton [47] documented such a nurse-plant effect for Pinus discolor growing under oaks and other species in similar habitat in the eastern part of the Chiricahua Mountains, a pattern observed elsewhere in southwestern piñon pine-dominated forests [86][87][88]. Xerophytic resprouters and obligate seeders alike may serve this same role in fostering P. discolor regeneration in the future, although increasing aridity under climate change may modulate this potential successional trajectory in coming decades.…”
Section: Wildfire Effects On Piñon Pine Forestmentioning
confidence: 94%