2021
DOI: 10.5194/cp-17-379-2021
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Response of biological productivity to North Atlantic marine front migration during the Holocene

Abstract: Abstract. Marine fronts delineate the boundary between distinct water masses and, through the advection of nutrients, are important facilitators of regional productivity and biodiversity. As the modern climate continues to change, the migration of frontal zones is evident, but a lack of information about their status prior to instrumental records hinders future projections. Here, we combine data from lipid biomarkers (archaeal isoprenoid glycerol dibiphytanyl glycerol tetraethers and algal highly branched isop… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
13
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 93 publications
1
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…3.2) can also be used as the phytoplankton biomarker in lieu of HBI III (e.g., Müller et al, 2011). Although in some regions high concentrations of HBI III have also been associated with highly productive marginal ice zones (Barents Sea, Belt et al, 2019), marine fronts (North Iceland Shelf, Harning et al, 2021), and sea ice (Amiraux et al, 2019(Amiraux et al, , 2021Koch et al, 2020) that may complicate PIP 25 -derived indices, recent compilations of Arctic surface sediments show that PIP 25 -based indices broadly correlate with spring and autumn sea ice concentrations (Xiao et al, 2015;Kolling et al, 2020).…”
Section: Hbismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3.2) can also be used as the phytoplankton biomarker in lieu of HBI III (e.g., Müller et al, 2011). Although in some regions high concentrations of HBI III have also been associated with highly productive marginal ice zones (Barents Sea, Belt et al, 2019), marine fronts (North Iceland Shelf, Harning et al, 2021), and sea ice (Amiraux et al, 2019(Amiraux et al, , 2021Koch et al, 2020) that may complicate PIP 25 -derived indices, recent compilations of Arctic surface sediments show that PIP 25 -based indices broadly correlate with spring and autumn sea ice concentrations (Xiao et al, 2015;Kolling et al, 2020).…”
Section: Hbismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1), has shown potential as a proxy of pelagic production for the spring marginal ice zone (MIZ) in polar seas (Belt et al, 2019;Collins et al, 2013;Köseoğlu et al, 2018;Smik et al, 2016a;Smik et al, 2016b). More recently, HBI III has also shown potential as a proxy for pelagic productivity associated with arctic sea fronts (Harning et al, 2020).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4a). The presence of sea ice likely disrupted primary production and food supply to the sea bed 34 , as the observed decline in shell growth around 1300 suggests (Fig. 2c).…”
Section: Regional Extent and Oceanography Of Destabilisationmentioning
confidence: 96%