2007
DOI: 10.1001/archderm.143.2.264
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Response of Bowen Disease to ALA-PDT Using a Single and a 2-Fold Illumination Scheme

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
56
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(58 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
2
56
0
Order By: Relevance
“…69 A number of studies have highlighted the effectiveness of 1 to 2 ALA-PDT treatment sessions in treating SCC in situ, with complete response at 12 months ranging from 80% to 100%. [70][71][72] ALA-PDT has shown particular efficacy in treating SCC in situ located on the lower leg, 71 a region of poor healing with other therapies. In a large randomized controlled trial that included 225 SCC in situ patients, MAL-PDT produced an 80% complete response rate by 12 months of follow-up, along with a good or excellent cosmetic outcome in 97% of cases.…”
Section: Photodynamic Therapymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…69 A number of studies have highlighted the effectiveness of 1 to 2 ALA-PDT treatment sessions in treating SCC in situ, with complete response at 12 months ranging from 80% to 100%. [70][71][72] ALA-PDT has shown particular efficacy in treating SCC in situ located on the lower leg, 71 a region of poor healing with other therapies. In a large randomized controlled trial that included 225 SCC in situ patients, MAL-PDT produced an 80% complete response rate by 12 months of follow-up, along with a good or excellent cosmetic outcome in 97% of cases.…”
Section: Photodynamic Therapymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[69][70][71][72][73] Results for ALA, [69][70][71][72] and MAL 73 are presented separately; AEs were not reported for the only trial using verteporfin.…”
Section: Results Of Safetymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, comparison of total pain over time resulted in no statistically significant difference in the median pain scores between the two treatment groups. In the trial by de Haas et al, 69 pain during treatment was experienced by five patients in the twofold-illumination group and by none of the patients in the single-illumination group. In the trial by Morton et al 70 comparing red and green light, no significant difference in pain was observed between the treatment groups.…”
Section: Ala-pdtmentioning
confidence: 92%
See 2 more Smart Citations