1995
DOI: 10.1113/jphysiol.1995.sp020767
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Response of C fibre nociceptors in the anaesthetized monkey to heat stimuli: correlation with pain threshold in humans.

Abstract: 1. Ramped heat stimuli were used to compare the effects of rate of temperature change on the responses of monkey nociceptors and on heat pain threshold in human subjects. Recordings were made from twenty-five cutaneous C fibre mechano-heat nociceptors (CMHs) innervating the hairy skin in the anaesthetized monkey. Heat pain thresholds were determined on the volar forearm of eight human subjects using a converging staircase technique. 2. The heat pain threshold decreased as stimulus ramp rate increased. In contr… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

5
77
0
2

Year Published

1996
1996
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 106 publications
(84 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
5
77
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, and as noted by Banik and Kabadi, 2013 [16], these withdrawal temperatures are comparable to those generated in humans (data herein and e.g. 47.5 o C, [28]). The rat heat thresholds reported here are somewhat lower than those reported using a similar method of measuring heat hyperalgesia described by Tabo and colleagues (1998).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 60%
“…Furthermore, and as noted by Banik and Kabadi, 2013 [16], these withdrawal temperatures are comparable to those generated in humans (data herein and e.g. 47.5 o C, [28]). The rat heat thresholds reported here are somewhat lower than those reported using a similar method of measuring heat hyperalgesia described by Tabo and colleagues (1998).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 60%
“…With heat ramps of different rates of rise to the same final temperature, peak discharge rates of C fibre nociceptors may vary by orders of magnitude: at a rate of rise similar to our rapidly rising heat stimuli (5 8 0C s-) the peak discharge was about 15 s-", while at a very low rate (0-1 00C s-) similar to our slowly rising stimuli peak discharges rarely exceeded 1 s-5 (Tillman et al 1995b). The observation that pain thresholds were higher for slowly rising heat stimuli than for fast temperature steps is in line with the concept of a central pain threshold, which can only be overcome by nociceptor firing frequencies above 0 4-0 5 Hz (van Hees & Gybels, 1981;Tillman et al 1995b). Thus, pain could be elicited by intraneural microstimulation of human C fibre nociceptors with frequencies of 1 Hz and above (Ochoa & Torebjbrk, 1989).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The second increase possibly reflects temporal summation of pain (Tousignant-Laflamme et al , 2008), the psychophysical correlate of wind-up (Eide, 2000). A-delta fibers are probably the source to the initial rise and fall because of rapid firing before gradually wearing out and a transition to a predominantly C fiber response occurs (Tillman et al , 1995, Treede, 1995, Tousignant-Laflamme et al , 2008. Therefore, the difference in pain ratings after 30 seconds may predominantly represent differences in C fiber activity.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%