2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.agee.2014.10.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Response of carabid beetles diversity and size distribution to the vegetation structure within differently managed field margins

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
37
3

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(46 citation statements)
references
References 62 publications
6
37
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Particular attention has been devoted to the structure of beetle bank vegetation (large carabid species prefer dense but homogeneous vegetation (Brose, 2003) while smaller ones are positively correlated with heterogeneous vegetation (Rouabah et al, 2015)) but little is known about the benefits they may offer to natural enemies visiting flowers (Ramsden et al, 2015). Hence, a challenge would be to conceive herbaceous strips that optimize both the structure of the vegetation and the provision of flower resources, i.e.…”
Section: Weedsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Particular attention has been devoted to the structure of beetle bank vegetation (large carabid species prefer dense but homogeneous vegetation (Brose, 2003) while smaller ones are positively correlated with heterogeneous vegetation (Rouabah et al, 2015)) but little is known about the benefits they may offer to natural enemies visiting flowers (Ramsden et al, 2015). Hence, a challenge would be to conceive herbaceous strips that optimize both the structure of the vegetation and the provision of flower resources, i.e.…”
Section: Weedsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several studies have analyzed the functional composition of consumer groups in response to environmental changes (de Sassi et al 2012, Börschig et al 2013, Penone et al 2013, Schuldt et al 2014. However, many of these studies were conducted in a land-use context (Woodcock et al 2010, Birkhofer et al 2015a, Rouabah et al 2015, and only very few focused on effects of plant diversity (Milcu et al 2013, Schuldt et al 2014. Hence, our knowledge of how the functional composition of consumer communities is affected by plant diversity remains limited (Lavorel et al 2013), but is essential to predict the consequences of plant diversity change for consumer-driven ecosystem services, such as pest-control.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Haschek et al (2012) found that Amara similata oocyte numbers were negatively related to distance from the nearest fallow, and that models best explaining the nutritional condition of male Poecilus cupreus and male A. similata contained parameters relating to percentage of surrounding crop area and distance from the nearest fallow, respectively. As grassy fallows and other non-crop areas represent important refuges for carabid beetles (Collins et al 2002;Rouabah et al 2015), the poorer condition of individuals needing to search further afield from these habitats may be related to scarcity of food resources. Indeed, pest abundance (a measure of prey availability) proved to be the most important factor explaining these measures of carabid fecundity and fitness, suggesting that knock-on effects of landscape factors on pest abundance are probably a more important influence on these characteristics in carabids than direct landscape effects.…”
Section: Generalist Predatorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Burgio et al 2006) as well as some spiders (e.g. Meek et al 2002) often show a greater diversity in flowering field margins than other margins or habitats, although vegetation structure species composition, age, and management are also important (Rouabah et al 2015; reviewed by Haaland et al 2011). Field margins have been shown to have positive effects on the abundance of these predators in adjacent crops including OSR; Frank and Nentwig (1995) and Frank (1997) showed species richness of carabid beetles and spiders in OSR was positively influenced by adjacent flowering 'weed' strips but the number of species and individuals was reduced with distance in-crop from the margin (see also Büchs 2003).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation