2011
DOI: 10.1096/fasebj.25.1_supplement.913.7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Response of colon cancer cells to selenium and cis‐platinum exposure

Abstract: Colon cancer is normally refractive to the chemotherapy drug cis‐platinum, (Cis‐Pt). Selenium (Se) containing glutathione peroxidase has been studied because of its role in reduction of reactive oxygen species which would improve the efficacy of Cis‐pt. The influence of Se on the effect of Cis‐PT on the HT‐29 colon cancer cell line was tested using a three dimensional agarose culture model. This method allowed independent analysis of mitosis and cell viability. Single cells were suspended in low temperature ag… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A nearly 48‐fold increase for 1 and 30‐fold for 2 . The IC 50 value of cisplatin against HT‐29 cancer cells ranged around ∼95 μM due to higher cisplatin resistance and thus less efficiency against slow growing colon cancer cells [18,19] . The structural difference between 1 and 2 does not show any notable effect on the cytotoxicity against HT‐29 as well.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A nearly 48‐fold increase for 1 and 30‐fold for 2 . The IC 50 value of cisplatin against HT‐29 cancer cells ranged around ∼95 μM due to higher cisplatin resistance and thus less efficiency against slow growing colon cancer cells [18,19] . The structural difference between 1 and 2 does not show any notable effect on the cytotoxicity against HT‐29 as well.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The IC 50 value of cisplatin against HT-29 cancer cells ranged around ~95 μM due to higher cisplatin resistance and thus less efficiency against slow growing colon cancer cells. [18,19] The structural difference between 1 and 2 does not show any notable effect on the cytotoxicity against HT-29 as well. The immense increase in biological activity could be explained by the choice of the ligands.…”
Section: Biological Activity Of 1 Andmentioning
confidence: 94%