2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.geoderma.2017.04.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Response of copper concentrations and stable isotope ratios to artificial drainage in a French Retisol

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Two European Reference Materials (ERM by the European Commission) standards (Cu nitrate solutions), ERM-AE-633 and ERM-AE-647 were recently proposed as new international standards (Moeller et al, 2012). The advantage of the ERM-AE-633 standard is that it has almost the same δ-value as the NIST-976 [variations of ±0.01 were reported by Moeller et al 2012, Šillerová et al (2017), Kříbek et al (2018)] and it was proposed that no conversion between δ-values reported relative to AE-633 is necessary (Peréz Rodríguez et al, 2013;Kusonwiriyawong et al, 2017). We report all δ-values relative to the NIST-976 standard and use the following conversion values: Moeller et al, 2012) Isotope Ratio Determinations of Cu, Zn, and Pb…”
Section: International Reference Standards and Standard Conversionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Two European Reference Materials (ERM by the European Commission) standards (Cu nitrate solutions), ERM-AE-633 and ERM-AE-647 were recently proposed as new international standards (Moeller et al, 2012). The advantage of the ERM-AE-633 standard is that it has almost the same δ-value as the NIST-976 [variations of ±0.01 were reported by Moeller et al 2012, Šillerová et al (2017), Kříbek et al (2018)] and it was proposed that no conversion between δ-values reported relative to AE-633 is necessary (Peréz Rodríguez et al, 2013;Kusonwiriyawong et al, 2017). We report all δ-values relative to the NIST-976 standard and use the following conversion values: Moeller et al, 2012) Isotope Ratio Determinations of Cu, Zn, and Pb…”
Section: International Reference Standards and Standard Conversionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Gleysol is typically characterized by the reduction and leaching of Fe‐bearing or Mn‐bearing minerals (i.e., lepidocrocite, goethite, and birnessite). The light Cu isotopes in Gleysol may be due to (a) oxidative dissolution of Fe‐bearing minerals, along with the preferential release of Cu (II) and heavy Cu isotopes into soil solutions; and (b) incorporation of Cu (II) into the structure of secondary Fe‐bearing minerals by substituting Cu for Fe (III) with a similar ionic radius, and preferential isotopically light Cu into precipitating Fe‐Al oxides (Kusonwiriyawong et al., 2017; Little et al., 2019; S. A. Liu et al., 2014; X. Liu et al., 2015). Conversely, Cu (II) in Fe‐bearing minerals can be reduced to Cu (I) under reducing conditions and leached into the soil solution, resulting in heavy Cu isotopes in soils (Babcsanyi et al., 2014; Kusonwiriyawong et al., 2016).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to the relatively strong bond strength between SOM and 65 Cu, organic complexes preferentially retain heavy Cu isotopes (Bigalke, Weyer, Kobza, & Wilcke, 2010; Pokrovsky et al., 2008; Ryan et al., 2014). Cu isotopes in groundwater can enrich heavy Cu isotopes, which may partly re‐sorb or re‐precipitate in soil residues as the groundwater level changes during the seasonal exchange (Kusonwiriyawong et al., 2017; Wang et al., 2022). In this study, the correlation analyses demonstrate that the δ 65 Cu value is independent of SOC in the upper part of S1 and S2 (>1 m), while the correlation with SOC ( R 2 = 0.80) in the zone of <1 m is generally stronger than that of Zones I, II, and III in S1 (Figure 9).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Meanwhile, isotope ratios of Cu have been used to trace Cu dynamics in soils ( Bigalke et al, 2010b ; Fekiacova et al, 2015 ; Babcsányi et al, 2016 ; Vance et al, 2016 ; Kusonwiriyawong et al, 2017 ; Blotevogel et al, 2018 ) and plants ( Weinstein et al, 2011 ; Jouvin et al, 2012 ; Ryan et al, 2013 ; Li et al, 2016 ; Blotevogel et al, 2019 ). While soil processes regulating Cu mobility and speciation, as complexation with organic ligands, redox reactions, and mineral dissolution, induce limited Cu-isotopic fractionation (<1‰), Cu uptake and translocation in plants have been observed to cause large fractionations up to −1.43‰ ( Bigalke et al, 2010a ; Weinstein et al, 2011 ; Jouvin et al, 2012 ; Mathur et al, 2012 ; Ryan et al, 2013 ; Babcsányi et al, 2016 ; Li et al, 2016 ; Blotevogel et al, 2018 , 2019 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%