2016
DOI: 10.17221/13/2016-jfs
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Response of diameter and height increment to thinning in oak-hornbeam coppice in the southeastern part of the Czech Republic

Abstract: ABSTRACT:The objective of this paper was to test the hypothesis that growth and soil moisture would increase after heavy thinning in seven years old oak-hornbeam coppice stand. Effects of thinning on (i) diameter and height increment of the remaining sprouts in polycormons, and (ii) soil moisture were studied one year after thinning. The experiment was carried out in the southeastern part of the Czech Republic. Thinning reduced 50% of the total stump basal area per polycormon. One to five dominant sprouts were… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“… Darenova et al (2018b) measured SWC in the profile of 0–6 cm on the same plots during several campaigns in 2015 and 2016 and observed a slightly higher SWC on T-0 compared to C-0 and lower SWC on both throughfall reduction plots (up to about 5 %). A positive effect of thinning on soil moisture was also confirmed by Fedorová et al (2018) at depths of 5, 10, 20, 30 and 40 cm on the same plots in 2015 as well as by del Campo et al (2019) in a holm oak coppice forest.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 52%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“… Darenova et al (2018b) measured SWC in the profile of 0–6 cm on the same plots during several campaigns in 2015 and 2016 and observed a slightly higher SWC on T-0 compared to C-0 and lower SWC on both throughfall reduction plots (up to about 5 %). A positive effect of thinning on soil moisture was also confirmed by Fedorová et al (2018) at depths of 5, 10, 20, 30 and 40 cm on the same plots in 2015 as well as by del Campo et al (2019) in a holm oak coppice forest.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 52%
“…(2011) because of the high variability among the individual sprouts. Nevertheless, a significantly higher stem increment was observed in the first year (2015) after the treatment in both species by Fedorová et al (2018) . Moreover, the summer drought in 2017 severely limited the coppice growth regardless of treatment.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…Average thinning intensity is preferred by visitors, compared to very dense stands (Jensen & Skovsgaard 2009) and thus improve the recreation value of urban forests. Q. petraea stands in Czech Republic responded well to thinning with a clear effect on diameter increment, less on height increment (Fedorová et al 2016). Thinning has been shown to reduce adverse effects of droughts and increases drought resistance of Q. petraea in France (Breda et al 1995, Schmitt et al 2020).…”
Section: )mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the dynamics and relationship between periodic annual height growth and stand density following thinning are complex [45,46]. Some studies have suggested that height growth and total height are relatively unaffected by thinning [29,[47][48][49][50]. On the other hand, other studies have observed thinning to have an obvious effect on tree height growth, especially at very high thinning intensities [27,[51][52][53][54][55].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In general, no matter how thinning affects diameter and height growth, it may be reasonable to expect that the allometric relationship of tree height and diameter will be different in thinned and unthinned stands. However, most existing studies on the influence of thinning on tree growth have often focused on how thinning affects tree height and diameter increments and have analyzed these two parameters separately [27,29,43,49,52]. We can only approximately deduce the influence of thinning on the tree height-diameter ratio from increment measurements, and we cannot obtain a detailed and accurate dynamic process of tree height-diameter allometry.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%