2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.proeng.2016.12.014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Response of E-glass/Epoxy and Dyneema ® Composite Laminates Subjected to low and High Velocity Impact

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
12
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
1
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…4 and 5 illustrate the force-time and force-displacement histories of different stacking sequenced glass (G), basalt (B) non-hybrid/hybrid fiber reinforced composites with respect to GnP filler content at 30 J. The sudden drop in contact force after first peak in force-time curve indicates the beginning of delamination or cracking damages as reported by many researchers [31,32]. , respectively.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 78%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…4 and 5 illustrate the force-time and force-displacement histories of different stacking sequenced glass (G), basalt (B) non-hybrid/hybrid fiber reinforced composites with respect to GnP filler content at 30 J. The sudden drop in contact force after first peak in force-time curve indicates the beginning of delamination or cracking damages as reported by many researchers [31,32]. , respectively.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…In addition, glass fiber hybridization contributed a positive effect on the basalt/glass hybrid composite structures in terms of flexural and tensile strength. When glass fiber is placed at outer the skin, and basalt fiber is in core in the middle, hybrid composite laminates have shown higher tensile/flexural strength compared to other hybrid configuration due to higher tensile/flexural strength and modulus of glass fibers [32]. It was also noted that flexural strain and modulus values were reached their maximum values with 0.1 wt% GnP filler, this could be attributed the better interfacial stress transfer at fiber/matrix/GnP particles, and these considerable improvements in flexural and tensile strength of composite samples filled with 0.1 wt% GnP suggest the improved interfacial bonding between fiber and matrix material mostly due to large surface area of GnP particles.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This composite is also characterized by the lowest Young's modulus among all of the tested materials. The results described in the literature [21] show that the composites reinforced by Dyneema fibers deformed to a greater extent than the composites reinforced by E-glass fibers. The comparison between the composites reinforced by Dyneema and E-glass fibers presented in the literature [21] showed also that the composite reinforced by Dyneema fibers absorbed much more impact energy.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…The results described in the literature [21] show that the composites reinforced by Dyneema fibers deformed to a greater extent than the composites reinforced by E-glass fibers. The comparison between the composites reinforced by Dyneema and E-glass fibers presented in the literature [21] showed also that the composite reinforced by Dyneema fibers absorbed much more impact energy. Based on the mentioned paper and observed damage (deformation of the sample), the authors suppose that the composite reinforced by polyethylene fibers absorbed a much higher amount of the impact energy than the other tested composites.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 77%
See 1 more Smart Citation