2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.eja.2023.126786
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Response of fruit yield, fruit quality, and water productivity to different irrigation levels for a microsprinkler-irrigated apple orchard (cv. Fuji) growing under Mediterranean conditions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
2
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
1
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Estimating stem water potential at midday in the different treatments presented values between -0.50 and -1.00 MPa (Figure 1). The variation of 0.5 MPa is similar to that presented by the water potential of the fruit tissues and is lower than the values reported by other authors in the fruit (17) . Boini and others (18) consider that -1 MPa does not represent limitations and establish a range between -1.5 and -2 MPa for in apple trees.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 78%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Estimating stem water potential at midday in the different treatments presented values between -0.50 and -1.00 MPa (Figure 1). The variation of 0.5 MPa is similar to that presented by the water potential of the fruit tissues and is lower than the values reported by other authors in the fruit (17) . Boini and others (18) consider that -1 MPa does not represent limitations and establish a range between -1.5 and -2 MPa for in apple trees.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 78%
“…Stem water potential at midday is considered a good indicator of water stress in apple trees (16)(17)(18) and has been evaluated in net response studies (19) . Recent studies examining different irrigation regimes and net types in apple cultivation establish the importance of crop water status on fruit quality (20) .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While a number of adaptation and mitigation strategies to cope with the effects of climate change on agriculture are being explored by scientists in warm temperate regions, many of these strategies may take as long as 10 to 20 years to be implemented ( Bruinsma, 2003 ). Promising strategies may include shifts to more suitable cultivation areas ( Drogoudi et al., 2020 ; Fernandez et al., 2020a ; del Barrio et al., 2021 ; Rojas et al., 2021 ; Noorazar et al., 2022 ; Meza et al., 2023 ), crop replacement and diversification ( Valverde et al., 2015 ; Almagro et al., 2023 ; Rezgui et al., 2024 ), the introduction of new cultivars ( Funes et al., 2016 ; Ruiz et al., 2019 ; Arenas-Castro et al., 2020 ; Cantin et al., 2020 ; Drogoudi et al., 2020 ), water management strategies ( Fraga et al., 2020 ; Aguirre-Garcia et al., 2021 ; Gutierrez-Gamboa et al., 2022 ; Lulane et al., 2022 ; Espinoza-Meza et al., 2023 ; Rojano-Cruz et al., 2023 ), and technological adaptation ( Luzio et al., 2021 ; Mazis et al., 2021 ; Rojas et al., 2021 ; Teker, 2023 ). However, as the impacts of climate change become increasingly severe, the adaptation and adoption of such strategies will require local and regional research, as well as effective governmental policies focused on the implementation of sustainable management practices and the adoption of new technologies.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%