2022
DOI: 10.1111/avsc.12690
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Response of ground macrolichens to site factors, co‐existing plants and forestry in boreal forests

Abstract: All material supplied via Jukuri is protected by copyright and other intellectual property rights. Duplication or sale, in electronic or print form, of any part of the repository collections is prohibited. Making electronic or print copies of the material is permitted only for your own personal use or for educational purposes. For other purposes, this article may be used in accordance with the publisher's terms. There may be differences between this version and the publisher's version. You are advised to cite … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 83 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The decline concerns the large reindeer lichens (e.g., Cladonia arbuscula and C. rangiferina ), many smaller Cladonia species and other terricolous taxa such as Cetraria spp. The process is mainly driven by the higher competitive ability of bryophytes, especially large species (Tonteri et al, 2022; Økland et al, 2023).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The decline concerns the large reindeer lichens (e.g., Cladonia arbuscula and C. rangiferina ), many smaller Cladonia species and other terricolous taxa such as Cetraria spp. The process is mainly driven by the higher competitive ability of bryophytes, especially large species (Tonteri et al, 2022; Økland et al, 2023).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The general conclusion drawn by Roturier et al (2011) was that both the degree of initial disturbance caused by MSP and the re-establishment rate of reindeer lichens must be considered when estimating the effect of MSP on lichen loss for reindeer grazing over time. Tonteri et al (2022) analysed how lichen cover responds to forest management, site, and stand variables, and to co-existing plants, in different boreal vegetation zones in Finland. The study was based on a survey of understory vegetation cover in 1721 permanent sample plots on mineral soil on productive forest land.…”
Section: Ground Vegetationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A methodological issue in some studies is the difficulty to strictly distinguish the effect of MSP on ground vegetation from that of harvesting (Bergstedt et al 2008;Vanha-Majamaa et al 2017). A challenge to interpreting the results of the survey study by Tonteri et al (2022) is that the occurrence of lichens prior to MSP being carried out probably affected which MSP practice was selected, with less intensive MSP practices being used on sites with high initial lichen cover and ploughing on sites with low cover. In addition, there is some uncertainty about which types of sites were included as the non-prepared controls.…”
Section: Conclusion and Research Needsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Forest regeneration has been intensified using soil scarification and planting. In combination with fertilization and plantation of Lodgepole pine ( Pinus contorta) , this has led to a densification of forest stands, which is a major contributing factor to the ground lichen decline with 71% since the 1950 (Sandström et al 2016 ; Tonteri et al 2022 ; Horstkotte et al 2023 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%