2012
DOI: 10.1093/forestry/cps060
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Response of herbaceous plant community diversity and composition to overstorey harvest within riparian management zones in Northern Hardwoods

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is still uncertain whether closed-forest species survive in the harvested sites, and whether non-forest species will be forced back as the stands close. Schumann et al (2003) and Zenner et al (2012) conceive that forest understory can be resilient enough to regenerate after harvest, but its success depends on many factors (e.g. logging technique, site characteristics or land-use history).…”
Section: Relevance and Limitations Of The Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It is still uncertain whether closed-forest species survive in the harvested sites, and whether non-forest species will be forced back as the stands close. Schumann et al (2003) and Zenner et al (2012) conceive that forest understory can be resilient enough to regenerate after harvest, but its success depends on many factors (e.g. logging technique, site characteristics or land-use history).…”
Section: Relevance and Limitations Of The Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, the results of the different studies are often contradictory considering the effects of management on understory vegetation (Duguid and Asthon 2013). In some cases, no impact could be detected (Bescond et al 2011;Zenner et al 2012), or the directions of the demonstrated effects were inconsistent (Halpern et al 2005vs. Kern et al 2014Godefroid et al 2005 vs. Jenkins andParker 2000).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The ecological roles of the herb layer and their importance could be summarized by five aspects: (i) contribution to forest biodiversity; (ii) as the site of initial competitive interactions important to the regeneration of dominant canopy species; (iii) its link with the overstory; (iv) its role in ecosystem functions (e. g. energy flow, nutrient cycling); and (v) its abilities to respond to various disturbances, both natural and induced by direct and indirect human activities [11]. A large number of species, easy assessment in the field, specific site requirements and the ability to respond to disturbances and different forest management decisions make the forest herb layer the most suitable indicator of the forest site conditions, environmental changes, forest dynamics and human impact [5,6,[12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24]. Numerous site-related factors, both biotic and abiotic, affect herbaceous plant communities in forests [3,[25][26][27][28][29].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This could be a reason of the increased abundance of Henlea species, especially H. perpusilla (Table 4) which is considered as species often found in wet habitats (Schmelz and Collado, 2010). There were no significant differences according to control neither in abundance nor in species richness in preparation cutting, where dispersed arrangement of retained trees has a buffering effect on the forest site conditions and understory (Halpern et al, 2005, Zenner et al, 2012.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 76%