2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.09.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Response of high-strength reinforced concrete beams under shock-tube induced blast loading

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

2
8
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
2
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…13 Figure 5c shows a schematic of the load-transfer device at rest and during testing. 6,13 The beams were connected to the end-frame using pin-pin supports, while dynamic reactions were captured using load-cells at the supports. Displacements were recorded using a linear variable differential transducer (LVDT) placed at mid-height of the specimen, with data also captured using a high-speed camera at 2000 frames/second.…”
Section: Blast Loading Testmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…13 Figure 5c shows a schematic of the load-transfer device at rest and during testing. 6,13 The beams were connected to the end-frame using pin-pin supports, while dynamic reactions were captured using load-cells at the supports. Displacements were recorded using a linear variable differential transducer (LVDT) placed at mid-height of the specimen, with data also captured using a high-speed camera at 2000 frames/second.…”
Section: Blast Loading Testmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To link the tests to actual blast conditions, the scaled distance (Z) for each blast test is reported in Table 4. For instance, Blast 2 approximates the shockwave generated by a blast having a scaled distance of 6.7 m/kg 1/3 , corresponding to 400 kg of TNT at a standoff of 50 m. 6 3 | EXPERIMENTAL RESULTS…”
Section: Blast Loading Testmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Blast loading response is an essential aspect of civilian and military structures that are likely to be subjected to accidental explosions and terrorist attacks (Chen et al, 2011;Jones, 1990). These extreme events demand a better understanding of structural behavior especially for appraising their safety (Biju et al, 2017;Jahami et al, 2019;Lee & Kwak, 2018;Li et al, 2018;Liu et al, 2018;Magnusson & Hallgren, 2004;Magnusson et al, 2010;Temsah et al, 2018;Young Lee et al, 2018;Zhang et al, 2013). Numerous experimental and numerical studies have been carried out in which damage of blast-loaded structural components is appraised (Guzas & Earls, 2011;Kirsch & Bogomolni, 2007;Nawar et al, 2021;Portioli, 2020;Tian et al, 2020;Wu et al, 2020;Yu et al, 2019).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [5] an experimental investigation is accomplished to assess the strain rate effect on HSC under dynamic loading, in which a noticeably rate dependency is remarked. In [6] an experimental program is carried out to test the performance of HSRC beams under quasi-static and blast loads. The main conclusion of the study is that the concrete strength does not significantly affect the specimen behavior under blast loads.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%