1987
DOI: 10.1080/00015128709436541
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Response of Laying Hens to Different Dietary Lysine Intakes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Higher requirements were reported by Uzu and Larbier (1985): 800 mg/bird per day and Al Bustany and Elwinger (1987): 820 mg/bird per day. This variation can be assigned to genetic and environmental differences.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 55%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Higher requirements were reported by Uzu and Larbier (1985): 800 mg/bird per day and Al Bustany and Elwinger (1987): 820 mg/bird per day. This variation can be assigned to genetic and environmental differences.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 55%
“…The estimate, considering 100% of the maximum value, is in accordance with the result of 1023 mg/bird per day obtained by Al Bustany and Elwinger (1987) to express the E max of laying hens using the same mathematical model. The equivalence between the optimum intake for the BL þQP and RM correlate with the estimate of 700 mg/bird per day Lys, which was found by Nathanael and Sell (1980), to maximize EM and the efficiency of utilization.…”
Section: Optimum Lysine Intakementioning
confidence: 94%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Studies have also shown that a specific AA deficiency, such as lysine and sulfur containing AA decreases feather condition. Al Bustani and Elwinger (1987) demonstrated a significant improvement in plumage condition when dietary lysine intake was increased from 485 to 587 mg h −1 d −1 in a low protein diet. A similar AA response on plumage condition was also reported by Elwinger et al (2002) when the lysine and methionine + cysteine levels in organic diets were increased from 5.9 and 5.1 to 8.7 and 6.7 g kg −1 , respectively.…”
Section: Feather Scorementioning
confidence: 99%