2003
DOI: 10.1016/s0304-3770(03)00013-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Response of mid-water common reed stands to water level variations and winter conditions in Lake Poygan, Wisconsin, USA

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
16
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
1
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Their results are comparable to what was observed for papyrus in less disturbed site, Singida. Likewise, some studies have shown that shoot density is higher in drier than in wet areas [28] [29] which agrees with our results of the disturbed area in Wasare.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…Their results are comparable to what was observed for papyrus in less disturbed site, Singida. Likewise, some studies have shown that shoot density is higher in drier than in wet areas [28] [29] which agrees with our results of the disturbed area in Wasare.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…The spatial change of nutrients showed that surface runoff was the source of nutrients coming into Baiyangdian wetlands. The dynamics of nutrient changes in reed belts were varied and complicated [30,31]. Water level fluctuations were assumed to be an important factor for the dynamics of reed belts [32].…”
Section: The Purification Mechanisms Of Littoral Zonesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, there are some restrictions since the model omits some processes that play a role in the natural situation. First, it is known that the growth of reed can be influenced by the seasonal water level regime (Bodensteiner and Gabriel 2003;Coops and others 2004). Water level regimes and hence depth variations could be modeled in PCLake, but the relation between water level, slope, and area of the marsh zone is not part of the model.…”
Section: Model Restrictionsmentioning
confidence: 99%