2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.combustflame.2010.04.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Response of partially premixed flames to acoustic velocity and equivalence ratio perturbations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
48
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 108 publications
(50 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
2
48
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is affected by different mechanisms acting simultaneously on the heat release rate fluctuation and therefore difficult to separate [25]: the axial velocity perturbation [26][27][28][29], the perturbation of swirl [30][31][32][33][34] and the perturbation of mixing [35][36][37][38]. The gain of FTFs for swirled flames exhibits a typical shape: it starts at 1, then increases towards a maximum, decreases to a local minimum at low frequencies, often reaches a second maximum at higher frequencies and decreases finally to low values at high frequencies.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is affected by different mechanisms acting simultaneously on the heat release rate fluctuation and therefore difficult to separate [25]: the axial velocity perturbation [26][27][28][29], the perturbation of swirl [30][31][32][33][34] and the perturbation of mixing [35][36][37][38]. The gain of FTFs for swirled flames exhibits a typical shape: it starts at 1, then increases towards a maximum, decreases to a local minimum at low frequencies, often reaches a second maximum at higher frequencies and decreases finally to low values at high frequencies.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…• Second, basic experiments studied in labs are usually operated at atmospheric pressure (Lawn et al 2004;Kornilov et al 2009;Karimi et al 2009;Kim et al 2010) to ease the technological issues. This means that the combustor chamber is not connected to a choked nozzle, eliminating any contribution of the indirect noise effect ab initio.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This method includes the following steps: 1) Calculating the BTM calculated by the FEM or ANM described above, 2) Choosing the self-excited frequencies from the pressure signals, 3) Solving the acoustic pressure and velocity at the plenum with the self-excited frequencies by the MMM, 4) Calculating the acoustic pressure according the eqn (10)(11)(12) and comparing the measurement values at point x 4 . Sound pressure level (SPL) from measuring point x 4 varies with the change of frequency as demonstrated in Fig.8 it shows total about eight resonance frequencies excited by the combustion instability in the range from 10 to 500Hz, which will be used in the next calculation.…”
Section: Experiments Validation Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Dowling et al [17,18] treated the burner as a simple duct or tube with constant cross section and length in a network model. Actually, it is also important to consider the real geometry of swirler burner for the effects of fuel impedance [19] and acoustic propagation in the swirler burner [10]. Fischer et al [20] split the burner into several elements with serial connections, and the BTM was obtained by multiplying the transfer matrices of all the elements.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%