2010
DOI: 10.3354/meps08595
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Response of Pocillopora verrucosa to corallivory varies with environmental conditions

Abstract: ) and fish predation (predators versus no predators), but not temperature, supported results of the microcosm experiment. Growth was greatest for corals in the high-flow, no predator treatment, and relatively high for injured corals in low flow. Together, these results suggest that P. verrucosa, a common branching coral, prioritizes overall growth over repair when injured by fish feeding, which differs from the outcome observed in a companion study in which juvenile colonies of massive Porites were subjected t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
10
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 74 publications
1
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Microenvironments such as regions of strong and weak current and high and low turbulence that exist around coral colonies may be preferentially utilized by different organisms. Corals grow more rapidly in high flow environments that occur on the tops of large bommies than lower in the water column where flow speeds are slower, most likely due to greater food fluxes and higher rates of mass transfer to coral tissue [ Lenihan and Edmunds , ; Schutter et al ., ]. Measurements in other systems have found that algal cover and morphology can be affected by reduced flow speeds that occur behind protruding bodies and within crevices [ Ferrier and Carpenter , ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Microenvironments such as regions of strong and weak current and high and low turbulence that exist around coral colonies may be preferentially utilized by different organisms. Corals grow more rapidly in high flow environments that occur on the tops of large bommies than lower in the water column where flow speeds are slower, most likely due to greater food fluxes and higher rates of mass transfer to coral tissue [ Lenihan and Edmunds , ; Schutter et al ., ]. Measurements in other systems have found that algal cover and morphology can be affected by reduced flow speeds that occur behind protruding bodies and within crevices [ Ferrier and Carpenter , ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moving water also exerts forces on organisms and thus affects the susceptibility to breakage or dislodgement of corals and algae and the energetic cost of occupying a given position on a reef [e.g., Madin and Connolly , ]. Flow can also mediate rates of coral recovery from corallivory and disturbances [ Lenihan and Edmunds , ]. Because many coral reef organisms are sessile or have a very small range, persistent spatial flow patterns can structure their distributions [ Edmunds et al ., ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, there are no clear patterns in how elevated temperatures affect tissue regeneration in scleractinians. For instance, warmer temperatures have little effect on tissue regeneration in Porites and Pocillopora Lenihan and Edmunds, 2010;Traylor-Knowles, 2016) while increasing wound healing rates in cold water corals (Burmester et al, 2017). Yet elevated temperatures reduce wound healing in Indo-Pacific Acropora spp.…”
Section: Rising Sea Surface Temperaturesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Corallivorous fish can impede coral recovery from natural perturbations (Rotjan et al 2006), especially juvenile branching acroporid corals (Knowlton et al 1990), which many corallivores favor (Cole et al 2008). Several studies have identified abiotic conditions that influence corallivore-coral interactions, such as water depth (e.g., Miller and Hay 1998) and habitat structure (Wellington 1982, Littler et al 1989, Lenihan and Edmunds 2010, Lenihan et al 2011. Despite this substantial body of work, we still have a poor understanding of how abiotic conditions and biotic processes interact to determine the distribution and abundance of benthic organisms, especially in coral reef communities.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To do this, we manipulated the access of corallivorous fishes to coral nubbins by using cages (Àpredator treatment) and cage controls (þpredator treatments, composed of partial cages); corals at each site were randomly assigned to treatments. Cages consisted of six-sided enclosures (15 3 15 3 15 cm) made of Vexar plastic (1-cm mesh size; Vexar Plastics, Los Angeles, California, USA), and cage controls were the same design but with two sides missing to allow corallivorous fishes access while exposing corals to hydrodynamic conditions similar to those within cages (Lenihan and Edmunds 2010). We used this size of predator exclusion cages and cage controls because, in a preliminary test, we observed butterflyfishes and other corallivores, especially spot-fin porcupinefish, whitespotted puffer, and the orange-striped triggerfish, biting branching corals within the cage controls, with all but the butterflyfishes leaving distinctive lesions.…”
Section: Effects Of Hydrodynamics On Coral Growthmentioning
confidence: 99%