2003
DOI: 10.4315/0362-028x-66.6.1071
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Response of Salmonella and Escherichia coli O157:H7 to UV Energy

Abstract: To determine the efficacy of a UV light treatment at 253.7 nm (UVC light) on microbial growth, plates containing tryptic soy agar plus 50 ppm of nalidixic acid (TSAN) were inoculated with known concentrations of five-strain cocktails of Salmonella and Escherichia coli O157:H7 and subjected to different UVC treatments. The concentration of the cocktail inoculum was determined with TSAN prior to inoculation. Serial dilutions were carried out, and inoculation levels of 10(0) to 10(8) CFU/ ml were tested for each … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
40
1

Year Published

2008
2008
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 68 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
2
40
1
Order By: Relevance
“…UV treatment of Red Delicious apples contaminated with Salmonella spp. or E. coli resulted in 2-3 orders of magnitude viable count reduction when samples were treated with 1.5-24 mW/cm 2 [116]. Ozer and Demirci [102] determined a reduction of approximately one order of magnitude for raw salmon filets irradiated with UV (treatment time, 60 s; 3 pulses/s; fluence, 5.6 J/cm 2 ) while no detrimental sensory changes were observed.…”
Section: Uv Light-advantages Drawbacks and Applicationsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…UV treatment of Red Delicious apples contaminated with Salmonella spp. or E. coli resulted in 2-3 orders of magnitude viable count reduction when samples were treated with 1.5-24 mW/cm 2 [116]. Ozer and Demirci [102] determined a reduction of approximately one order of magnitude for raw salmon filets irradiated with UV (treatment time, 60 s; 3 pulses/s; fluence, 5.6 J/cm 2 ) while no detrimental sensory changes were observed.…”
Section: Uv Light-advantages Drawbacks and Applicationsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…3). This behaviour has been explained in several different ways, like lack of homogeneous population (Xiong et al, 1999), multi-hit phenomena (Yousef and Marth, 1988), presence of soluble solids (Koutchma, 2009), different abilities of cells to repair DNA mutations (Wekhof, 2000), sample topography, and shading effect that may have been originated by the edge of the Petri dishes used in the experiment (G omez-L opez et al, 2007;Yaun et al, 2003Yaun et al, , 2004. Higher levels of inactivation were reached for the systems with higher temperature build-up compared to the lowest one, for both strains and matrixes.…”
Section: Pl Inactivationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, the log reduction of E. coli was parabolic in LEY and LWE samples suggesting that exposure time was also significant (p ( 0.05) for UV-C radiation process. Many researchers (Matak et al, 2005;Murakami et al, 2006;Ngadi et al, 2003;Quintero-Ramos et al, 2004;Wright et al, 2000;Yaun, Sumner, Eifert, & Marcy, 2003) found UV dose (time  UV incident intensity) as the major factor for inactivation of E. coli. Additionally, the relationship between time and UV incident intensity was reported to be important for the design of UV equipment (Murakami et al, 2006;Sommer et al, 1998).…”
Section: Inactivation Of E Coli (Atcc 8739) In Lep Samplesmentioning
confidence: 99%