2013
DOI: 10.1007/s40333-013-0211-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Response of soil N2O emissions to precipitation pulses under different nitrogen availabilities in a semiarid temperate steppe of Inner Mongolia, China

Abstract: Short-term nitrous oxide (N 2 O) pulse emissions caused by precipitation account for a considerable portion of the annual N 2 O emissions and are greatly influenced by soil nitrogen (N) dynamics. However, in Chinese semiarid temperate steppes, the response of N 2 O emissions to the coupling changes of precipitation and soil N availability is not yet fully understood. In this study, we conducted two 7-day field experiments in a semiarid temperate typical steppe of Inner Mongolia, China, to investigate the N 2 O… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
10
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
1
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Water addition decreased CH 4 uptake by 23.9%, which is dramatically smaller than an inhibition impact of 61% from a grassland in California [Blankinship et al, 2010 b] (Table 4). The reason is that this study site is much drier compared to California site (~300 vs. 652mm); therefore, our study has much larger CH 4 uptake rate (-5 was observed under nitrogen addition treatment (p=0.02), which is consistent with previously reported N-impact on N 2 O (0-87%) [Horváth et al, 2010;Li et al, 2012;Liu et al, 2014;Zhang and Han, 2008]. In addition, water addition had a significant stimulating impact (8.8%-120%) on N 2 O emission (p = 0.03), consistent with 0-100% reported by previous studies [Chen et al, 2013;Horváth et al, 2010;Liu et al, 2014;Zhang and Han, 2008] (Table 4).…”
Section: Comparisons With Other Studiessupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Water addition decreased CH 4 uptake by 23.9%, which is dramatically smaller than an inhibition impact of 61% from a grassland in California [Blankinship et al, 2010 b] (Table 4). The reason is that this study site is much drier compared to California site (~300 vs. 652mm); therefore, our study has much larger CH 4 uptake rate (-5 was observed under nitrogen addition treatment (p=0.02), which is consistent with previously reported N-impact on N 2 O (0-87%) [Horváth et al, 2010;Li et al, 2012;Liu et al, 2014;Zhang and Han, 2008]. In addition, water addition had a significant stimulating impact (8.8%-120%) on N 2 O emission (p = 0.03), consistent with 0-100% reported by previous studies [Chen et al, 2013;Horváth et al, 2010;Liu et al, 2014;Zhang and Han, 2008] (Table 4).…”
Section: Comparisons With Other Studiessupporting
confidence: 90%
“…This lack of response in soil moisture to rainfall reduction might be because precipitation is mainly concentrated in summer period, and subsurface lateral water flow reduced the effect of rainfall reduction. Although rainfall reduction had no significant effect on soil moisture; it did decrease the precipitation pulses which could cause short peak emissions of N 2 O emission 32 33 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…First, soil N 2 O emissions are influenced by numerous factors, including precipitation, temperature, forest type, and soil texture and characteristics 7 , and small changes in these variables may result in large differences in N 2 O emissions 3 . Second, N 2 O emissions are characterized by short pulse emissions related to nitrogen deposition 31 , precipitation 32 33 , freeze-thaw cycles 34 and drying-wetting events 35 . And these pulse events of N 2 O emission may be extremely important contributions to the total annual budget 30 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…and Liu et al . (refs 31,32 ), who reported that peak N 2 O fluxes associated with coupled fertilizer-precipitation events accounted for as much as 50–60% of the total emissions. In accordance with previous literature 31,32 , peak fluxes in our study were associated with fertilizer application times coupled with precipitation events (Fig.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%