Response of Soybean [Glycine max (L.)Merrill] to Irrigation at Different Growth Stages

Jaybhay, S. A.; Varghese, Philips; Jaybhay, S P; Idhol, B D; Waghmare, B.N.; Salunkhe, D.H.

doi:10.18805/ag.d-4932

Cited by 3 publications

(4 citation statements)

References 2 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…For soybean, Baghel et al [82] showed that water stress at the flowering stage severely decreased all of the above parameters in soybean. Jaybhay et al [83] reported that irrigation to the soybean crop at flower initiation and seed filling stages helps to obtain the optimum WUE. Currently, many studies only focused on the critical growth stages, not quantitative analysis on the stress factors of WUE-SF for soybean.…”

Section: Wue-sf Under Water Stresses For Different Eroded Soilsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Water Use Efficiency of Soybean under Water Stress in Different Eroded Soils

Xie

Liu

et al. 2020

Water

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Soil erosion could change the effective storage of soil moisture and affected crop water use efficiency (WUE). To quantitative study differences in the WUE of soybean and the crop’s response to water stress for soils with different degrees of erosion in northeastern China, three erosion degrees—(1) lightly, (2) moderately and (3) severely—eroded black undisturbed soils and four years (from 2013 to 2016) of soybean pot experiments were used to control soil water content (100%, 80%, 60%, and 40% field capacity (FC)) and observe the crop growth processes. To study the relationships between erosion–water use–productivity, the following results were achieved: (1) the optimal water content was 80% FC for lightly eroded soil (L) and 100% FC for both moderately (M) and severely (S) eroded soil. Yield (Y) was best in M with the value of 3.12 t ha−1, which was 4.6% and 85.5% higher than L and S, respectively. Under the conditions of adequate water supply, there was no significant change in Land M, but the values were significantly different for the S ( p < 0.05). (2) Y and biomass (B) were sensitive to water stress except in the branching stage. (3) The values of WUEY and WUEB for the three eroded soils were the best at 80% FC. The stress coefficient (SF) values of the three eroded soils were not significantly different. In the flowering and pod formation stage, the SF reached the maximum under waterlogging stress. While the water shortage stress reached the maximum in the seed filling stage, the soil water content decreased by 10%, and the WUEB decreased by 15%, which was 2.5 times more powerful than the waterlogging stress. This study indicated the change in soybean growth with respect to the water response caused by soil erosion, and provided a scientific basis and data for the reasonable utilization of black soil with different erosion intensities. The results also provided important parameters for the growth of simulated crops.

show abstract

Section: Wue-sf Under Water Stresses For Different Eroded Soilsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Water Use Efficiency of Soybean under Water Stress in Different Eroded Soils

Xie

Liu

et al. 2020

Water

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Organic nutrient management ensued significantly higher number of pods/plant and seed yield than inorganic and integrated practices (Shirale et al, 2017). Crop with organic sources showed about 18.5% increase in yield over inorganically managed crop, which might be owing to application of organic sources of nutrients (Jaybhay et al, 2015).…”

Section: Effect Of Nutrient Management On Yield Attributes and Yield ...mentioning

confidence: 93%

“…is an important oilseed crop and finds an important place in crop rotations of Central India. Soybean fixes atmospheric nitrogen, thus enriches the soil and partially fulfil the nitrogen requirement of succeeding crops for higher productivity (Jaybhay et al, 2015). Similarly, linseed (Linum usitatissimum L.) occupies the second position among the winter (rabi) season oilseed crops next to rapeseed-mustard.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Production potential, soil health and economics of soybean (Glycine max)-linseed (Linum usitatissimum) cropping system under various nutrient-management protocols

A.B. SINGH,

B.P. MEENA,

B.L. LAKARIA

et al. 2022

IJA

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The field experiment was conducted during the rainy (kharif) season of 2015 to winter (rabi) season of 2020–21 at the research farm of the ICAR-Indian Institute of Soil Science, Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh, to investigate the performance of soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr.]-linseed [Linum usitatissimum (L.)] cropping sequence and its effect on soil health. The treatments consisted of 6 nutrient- management protocols, viz. 100% organic, 75% organic + innovative, 50% organic + 50% inorganic, 75% organic + 25% inorganic, 100% inorganic and state recommendations, laid out in a randomized block design with 4 replications in permanent plots. Soybean cv. ‘JS 335’ and linseed cv. ‘JL 9’ were grown with a recommended dose of N : P : K as 30 : 26.2 : 16.6 and 60 : 17.5 : 0 kg/ha respectively. Cattle dung manure (CDM), vermicompost and poultry manures were used to supply nitrogen in organic nutrient-management in 1 : 1 : 1 proportion and chemical fertilizers were applied as per treatments details. In the innovative practice, 10% vermiwash and 10% cow urine were sprayed at 30 and 45 days after sowing (DAS). In integrated nutrient-management, nitrogen (N) was supplied through organic sources and remaining amount of N was broadcasted through chemical fertilizer. The pooled data revealed that, the soybean and linseed yields were 18.5 and 12.7% higher under organic nutrient management than the inorganic practices. The integrated nutrientmanagement practices (50% organic + 50% organic) also registered 6.7 and 5.1% higher yield of soybean and linseed than the recommended dose of fertilizer application respectively. The organic nutrient-management was reflected as economically viable practice as evident from benefit : cost ratio. The organic nutrient-management also showed significant increase in soil organic carbon (SOC) and soil biological properties. Thus, the results indicated that the organic nutrient-management improved the soil health and increased the crop yield of soybean-linseed cropping system.

show abstract

“…Baghel et al (2018) showed that water stress at the flowering stage severely decreased all of the above parameters in soybean. Jaybhay et al (2019) reported that irrigation of soybean crop at flower initiation and seed filling stages helped to obtain optimal WUE. This study proves that the AquaCrop model moderately predicts soybean growth and yield using mulch in a tropical environment.…”

Section: Effectiveness Of Alternative Irrigationmentioning

confidence: 99%

The Use of Aquacrop Model for Soybean in Various Water Availability Within a Lysimeter System

Ramadhani,

Bowo,

Slameto

2023

J. appl. agricultural sci. technol.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The AquaCrop model is widely used under various agro-ecological conditions to reduce farm water consumption. The study aimed to simulate, validate, and measure the performance of AquaCrop models for canopy cover, biomass and soybean crop yields cultivated within a lysimeter. This research was conducted in the experimental field of the Faculty of Agriculture, the University of Jember, Indonesia (8°09'45.1" S, 113°42'58.2" E, 101 m a.s.l). There are four treatments in 4 lysimeters, namely P1 (irrigation based on recommendation), P2 (irrigation 95-105% FC), P3 (irrigation 75-85% FC) and P4 (irrigation 55-65% FC). The AquaCrop model is calibrated using canopy cover (CC) and then validated to predict the biomass and soybean yield. The experiment revealed that the model simulates better CC, biomass, and soybean yields with full irrigation than deficit irrigation. The performance of the AquaCrop model for soybeans of the Deja 2 variety in predicting CC, biomass, and soybean yield is impressive and reasonable. For the CC we found R2 ranges from 0.956 to 0.995, RMSE 10.389% to 3,293%, NRMSE 0.154% to 0.051%, NSE 0.918 to 0.992, and d 0.980 to 0.998. For biomass the R2 is 0.842, RMSE 0.111 t ha-1, NRMSE 0.017%, NSE 0.712, and d 0.937. For soybeans production the R2 is 0.999, RMSE 0.045 t.ha-1, NRMSE 0.018%,, NSE 0.908 and d 0.970. This study demonstrated that based on WUE, 55-65% FC irrigation is the most efficient application.

show abstract

Response of Soybean [Glycine max (L.)Merrill] to Irrigation at Different Growth Stages

Cited by 3 publications

References 2 publications

Water Use Efficiency of Soybean under Water Stress in Different Eroded Soils

Water Use Efficiency of Soybean under Water Stress in Different Eroded Soils

Production potential, soil health and economics of soybean (Glycine max)-linseed (Linum usitatissimum) cropping system under various nutrient-management protocols

The Use of Aquacrop Model for Soybean in Various Water Availability Within a Lysimeter System

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About