2017
DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2017.01821
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Response of Summer Maize Photosynthate Accumulation and Distribution to Shading Stress Assessed by Using 13CO2 Stable Isotope Tracer in the Field

Abstract: Maize is one of the most important crops globally that provides food, feed, and bioenergy. However, shading stress threatens maize production. In this study, we investigated the effects of shading on photosynthate accumulation and distribution of summer maize in the field. Zhengdan958 (ZD958) and Denghai 605 (DH605) were used as experimental materials in a field experiment running from 2013 to 2015. Shading treatments were applied over different growth stages: from the tassel stage (VT) to physiological maturi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

5
42
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 55 publications
(48 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
5
42
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The reduced post-silking dry matter accumulation may be due to the decreased photosynthetic capacity attributed to light deprivation, which limits the source capacity for grain development [5,6,8,11]. The low SPAD value and photosynthetic rate (unpublished data) under shading indicated that the photosynthetic function deteriorated, and the leaf photoprotection mechanism was probably damaged, thereby decreasing photosynthesis and dry matter accumulation [10]. Nevertheless, studies on rice [32,33] and wheat [34] have found that leaf chlorophyll content is increased by shading, thereby improving the light harvesting potential to enhance light-use efficiency and reducing the dissipation of light energy.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The reduced post-silking dry matter accumulation may be due to the decreased photosynthetic capacity attributed to light deprivation, which limits the source capacity for grain development [5,6,8,11]. The low SPAD value and photosynthetic rate (unpublished data) under shading indicated that the photosynthetic function deteriorated, and the leaf photoprotection mechanism was probably damaged, thereby decreasing photosynthesis and dry matter accumulation [10]. Nevertheless, studies on rice [32,33] and wheat [34] have found that leaf chlorophyll content is increased by shading, thereby improving the light harvesting potential to enhance light-use efficiency and reducing the dissipation of light energy.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Root physiological properties (dry weight, root/shoot ratio, absorption area) are deteriorated by shading [9]. Additionally, leaf relative chlorophyll content and plant dry matter accumulation are reduced [10], resulting in grain yield loss. Under low light conditions, the activity of the carbon-concentrating mechanism generally decreases [1].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The photosynthesis is influenced by differentiation and development of thin-walled tissue which is extremely sensitive to shading [3,4]. In recent years, researches pay more attention to shade stress of C4 plants [4][5][6][7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, the numbers of cloudy/overcast/rainy days from early‐June to mid‐July in 2016 and 2017 in Yangzhou were 47 and 46, respectively (data available at http://www.tianqihoubao.com/lishi/yangzhou.html). Studies have observed that postsilking shading decreases photosynthetic and electron transport rates (Gao, Zhao, et al, ; Reed, Singletary, Schussler, Williamson, & Christy, ; Ren et al, ; Zhong, Shi, Li, & Huang, ), damages the leaf mesophyll cell ultrastructure (Ren et al, ), reduces the activities of enzymes involved in photosynthesis (Sharwood, Sonawane, & Ghannoum, ) and the activity of the carbon‐concentrating mechanism with increased leakiness (Bellasio & Griffiths, ), affects the root morphology and activity indices (Gao, Shi, et al, ), increases the grain abscisic acid (ABA) content (Setter, Flannigan, & Melkonian, ), and reduces the endosperm cell number and volume (Jia, Li, Dong, & Zhang, ). These adverse effects reduce the dry matter and nutrient accumulation (Cui et al, ; Gao, Zhao, et al, ; Liu & Tollenaar, ; Mbewe & Hunter, ), increase aborted grain numbers due to the nearly halted filling of apical grains, and decrease grain weight (Cui, Camberato, Jin, & Zhang, ; Reed et al, ; Setter et al, ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%