2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.123418
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Response of syntrophic bacterial and methanogenic archaeal communities in paddy soil to soil type and phenological period of rice growth

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…RDA showed that moisture, pH, and TP were the major controlling factors at phylum level, and -N and multi-electron acceptors had significant effects at genus level ( Figures 5A , B ). Similarly, previous studies found that pH and moisture had crucial effects on the microbial community (Banning et al, 2011 ; Pan et al, 2021 ), and nutrients also could alter microbial composition (Francioli et al, 2018 ). Thus, moisture, pH, and TP had crucial effects in shaping microbial community under phylum- and genus-levels.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 54%
“…RDA showed that moisture, pH, and TP were the major controlling factors at phylum level, and -N and multi-electron acceptors had significant effects at genus level ( Figures 5A , B ). Similarly, previous studies found that pH and moisture had crucial effects on the microbial community (Banning et al, 2011 ; Pan et al, 2021 ), and nutrients also could alter microbial composition (Francioli et al, 2018 ). Thus, moisture, pH, and TP had crucial effects in shaping microbial community under phylum- and genus-levels.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 54%
“…The Proteobacteria abundance under all the other treatments decreased compared with the control treatment. This could be a result of how soil pH influences nutrient (small molecules, P, and N) solubilization, which in turn influences the development of microbes [40]. Relative to the control, the Bacillaceae abundance in soil substantially differed under M and BM treatments.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2) in the intracellular propionate degradation pathways of SPOB, and how Candidatus SPOB (such as Cloacimonetes) conduct the energetically unfavorable oxidation of succinate to fumarate. Continuing research relating to the possible division of labor to amino acid biosynthesis and amino acid or fructose exchange between syntrophic interacting strains , promotion of syntrophic propionate oxidation by intermediates such as succinate (Pan et al 2021), and potential flagellum-mediated syntrophic interaction is highly important in this regard. Communications by exchanging quorum-sensing molecules and connections via membranederived nanotubes have been demonstrated in anaerobic cultures that interact nutritionally in tight cell-cell interactions (Pande et al 2015;Ranava et al 2021).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Propionate oxidation can occur at a broad range of pH values (Table S8, Supporting Information). For instance, in acidic fens and upflow anaerobic sludge beds, methane formation from propionate has been reported at pH levels as low as 4.5 (Schmidt et al 2016;Zhang et al 2016), while in rice field soil presence of known SPOB and methane formation have been reported at pH 5.0 (Pan et al 2021). However, at these low pH values syntrophic propionate oxidation and methane formation are generally quite low, due to restricted activity of many methanogens and acetogens.…”
Section: Phmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation