2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.soildyn.2016.01.018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Response of the Fatih Sultan Mehmet Suspension Bridge under spatially varying multi-point earthquake excitations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To study seawater layer effects on the dynamic response of a sea-crossing bridge under tri-directional spatial ground motions, the seismic analysis of a large span cable-stayed bridge was conducted using the generated multi-point artificial waves [26][27][28]. The bridge has five spans; the main span of 436 m, first side spans of 126 m and second side spans of 60 m. The height of left towel of bridge is 167.19 m, its pier has height of 55.73 m; the height of right towel is 172.69 m, its pier has height of 61.23 m. A 3D finite element model of the cable-stayed bridge was developed using ANSYS software, as shown in Fig.…”
Section: Finite Element Modelingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To study seawater layer effects on the dynamic response of a sea-crossing bridge under tri-directional spatial ground motions, the seismic analysis of a large span cable-stayed bridge was conducted using the generated multi-point artificial waves [26][27][28]. The bridge has five spans; the main span of 436 m, first side spans of 126 m and second side spans of 60 m. The height of left towel of bridge is 167.19 m, its pier has height of 55.73 m; the height of right towel is 172.69 m, its pier has height of 61.23 m. A 3D finite element model of the cable-stayed bridge was developed using ANSYS software, as shown in Fig.…”
Section: Finite Element Modelingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the previous studies, the obtained frequencies from full‐scale dynamic and ambient vibration tests on the bridge were within the expected values and could be used for validation of a numerical model of the bridge. Considering spatially varying multi‐point earthquake excitations, Apaydin et al 11 first conducted a detailed numerical investigation on the Fatih Sultan Mehmet Bridge. They revealed that the results under multi‐point earthquake motions obtained were relatively higher when compared with those from uniform ground motion and that the displacement response of the towers and deck under non‐uniform earthquake motion differed from that of uniform motion.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to the diversification of structural forms, the seismic responses of multipoint excitation are also different. Scholars at home and abroad focused on some large-span structures represented by some bridges [3][4][5][6] and then paid attention to some unique structures, such as arch trusses [7], arch dams [8], string support shell [9], cable dome [10,11], long tunnel [12], and multitower and conjoined structure [13,14].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%