2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.fusengdes.2017.03.167
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Response of the imaging cameras to hard radiation during JET operation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, one of the specks appearing in FY 2017 (indicated by a blue arrow) disappeared at the beginning in FY2018. This phenomenon can be explained by the so called self-annealing which was reported in the CCD camera mounted in the JET tokamak [10]. In LHD, this self-annealing is found in some pixels even in Fig.…”
Section: Investigation Of the Influence Of The Cumulative Radiation Flux On The Image Sensormentioning
confidence: 80%
“…For example, one of the specks appearing in FY 2017 (indicated by a blue arrow) disappeared at the beginning in FY2018. This phenomenon can be explained by the so called self-annealing which was reported in the CCD camera mounted in the JET tokamak [10]. In LHD, this self-annealing is found in some pixels even in Fig.…”
Section: Investigation Of the Influence Of The Cumulative Radiation Flux On The Image Sensormentioning
confidence: 80%
“…whereas digital cameras show a strong response to hard radiation and neutrons due to failure of the camera digital electronics [16]. The drawback of analogue cameras is the rather low sensitivity around 1 μm wavelength (<10%) for silicon-based detectors and the low dynamic range of the uncooled CCD sensor (8bit) [17].…”
Section: Protection Camerasmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For reliable operation of the imaging system in the hostile electro magnetic environment of JET-ILW, the protection cameras must meet the following main criteria of an undisturbed operation of CCD sensors and electronics in the presence of a magnetic field and acceptable resistance to neutrons and gamma radiation. Video cameras should operate without replacement at least one year, withstanding a neutron fluence of ~2 × 10 12 n cm −2 [16]. In contrast to a digital video camera, an analogue one can fulfil these criteria easily because of its robustness and stable operation under harsh electromagnetic as well as radiation conditions-features which are particularly desirable in protection systems.…”
Section: Protection Camerasmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, g-rays produced through the neutron capture are emitted from plasma facing components and laboratory structural materials, which also create a huge background noise on the CCD. [10][11][12] These noises lower the CCD capability of measuring a high-quality spectrum, e.g. significant decrease in signal-to-noise ratio.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%