2012
DOI: 10.1177/1084713812448547
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Response Pattern Based on the Amplitude of Ear Canal Recorded Cochlear Microphonic Waveforms across Acoustic Frequencies in Normal Hearing Subjects

Abstract: Low-frequency otoacoustic emissions (OAEs) are often concealed by acoustic background noise such as those from a patient's breathing and from the environment during recording in clinics. When using electrocochleaography (ECochG or ECoG), such as cochlear microphonics (CMs), acoustic background noise do not contaminate the recordings. Our objective is to study the response pattern of CM waveforms (CMWs) to explore an alternative approach in assessing cochlear functions. In response to a 14-msec tone burst acros… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

3
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These three paradigms, and thus evoked CMs, have been previously discussed and addressed. 16 Based on this previous report, only a couple of period cycles appear in a click-evoked CM, which is represented by ringing of the basilar membrane and represents activities associated with many frequencies. 56 , 57 Compared to click-evoked CMs, a short toneburst evoked CM contains more periods of cycles and represents fewer frequencies, and therefore, is more frequency specific.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These three paradigms, and thus evoked CMs, have been previously discussed and addressed. 16 Based on this previous report, only a couple of period cycles appear in a click-evoked CM, which is represented by ringing of the basilar membrane and represents activities associated with many frequencies. 56 , 57 Compared to click-evoked CMs, a short toneburst evoked CM contains more periods of cycles and represents fewer frequencies, and therefore, is more frequency specific.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…13 , 14 In addition, we have addressed high frequency CMs in two recent articles in 2012. 15 , 16 Therefore, we focus on the low-frequency CM in this report by extending our attention to one more factor, intensity dependence.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One of the limitations here is that this study used only click stimuli as opposed to pure tone stimuli to perform ECochG, and hence our results lack tone specificity. Current clinical reports indicate more consistent findings with low-frequency tone bursts (Hornibrook et al 2012;Iseli and Gibson 2010;Zhang 2012). It is possible that tone bursts might yield more reliable findings.…”
Section: Limitations Of the Study And Future Directionsmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…Other research has involved the use of a canal electrode rather than a concha electrode to measure response patterns of CM waveforms (Zhang 2012). As previously described, the CMWs are still CMs but contain multiple sinusoidal waveforms evoked by a relatively long tone burst (e.g., 14 msec) (Zhang 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other research has involved the use of a canal electrode rather than a concha electrode to measure response patterns of CM waveforms (Zhang 2012). As previously described, the CMWs are still CMs but contain multiple sinusoidal waveforms evoked by a relatively long tone burst (e.g., 14 msec) (Zhang 2012). In this study, we are investigating the use of a concha electrode in measuring CMWs at different acoustic frequencies and analyze the response pattern based on the amplitude of the CMWs across these frequencies.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%