1997
DOI: 10.1016/s0895-4356(97)00126-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Response rates to mail surveys published in medical journals

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

200
1,048
41
19

Year Published

1998
1998
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1,885 publications
(1,308 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
200
1,048
41
19
Order By: Relevance
“…However, transplant recommendations by the adult and pediatric nephrologists (82% vs. 78%) were similar. Additionally, our overall response rate surpasses the mean response rate of 54% for published physician surveys (23). Furthermore, the analyses comparing responders to nonresponders demonstrated no differences in response rate by geographic region.…”
Section: Compliancecontrasting
confidence: 46%
“…However, transplant recommendations by the adult and pediatric nephrologists (82% vs. 78%) were similar. Additionally, our overall response rate surpasses the mean response rate of 54% for published physician surveys (23). Furthermore, the analyses comparing responders to nonresponders demonstrated no differences in response rate by geographic region.…”
Section: Compliancecontrasting
confidence: 46%
“…7 Although not directly linked to ascertainment rates, response rates are straightforward to measure and are the most common method for assessing the potential for selection bias. 8 Whilst no differences in response rates between ophthalmologists by type of hospital and principal appointment (NHS consultants and other grades) were noted, a variation in regional response rates was evident. Despite this and the positive correlation between card return rates and true case reporting, it remains difficult to estimate the overall effects on ascertainment.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…9 However, some may also feel more comfortable not responding, since their non-response will go undetected. 8 There were no opportunities to issue reminders or replacement questionnaires, which would have increased the response rate, but the response rate achieved was comparable with similar surveys. 8 As there was an overrepresentation of case reporters amongst those who participated in the survey, there may have been an overstating of positive sentiments.…”
Section: Survey Of Participating Ophthalmologistsmentioning
confidence: 86%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Although there is a chance of a non-response bias, well-done physician surveys often only achieve response rates of around 50%. [30][31][32][33] The risk strata cut-offs were determined using the 25th percentiles from the distribution of physician responses to satisfy 75% of physicians. Such cut-offs could be insufficient for up to 25% of physicians.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%