2016
DOI: 10.1002/poi3.139
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Response Scales in Voting Advice Applications: Do Different Designs Produce Different Outcomes?

Abstract: Voting Advice Applications (VAAs) represent popular election campaign tools in many countries, enabling voters to discover which party or candidate provides the best match with their political preferences. This article examines the effects of design choices on these tools by focusing on the response scale that is used to measure the policy positions of parties and voters. We analyze the impact of scale length on the advice generated by these tools using user data from a VAA developed for the 2014 Dutch local e… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Analyzing VAA log files (e.g. Alvarez et al 2014;Dinas et al 2014;Germann and Mendez 2016;Rosema and Louwerse 2016;Garry et al Forthcoming) makes it possible to measure the information that was communicated to VAA users. However, shifting the analysis to VAA-generated data in our case implies dropping the control group of non-users.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Analyzing VAA log files (e.g. Alvarez et al 2014;Dinas et al 2014;Germann and Mendez 2016;Rosema and Louwerse 2016;Garry et al Forthcoming) makes it possible to measure the information that was communicated to VAA users. However, shifting the analysis to VAA-generated data in our case implies dropping the control group of non-users.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While Downs (1957: pp. 213-214) anticipated that information flows from traditional media will be tainted by partisan bias potentially leading to "echo chambers," whatever flaws present in the information provided by VAAs are associated with limitations in their design rather than with partisan considerations (see Walgrave et al 2009;Mendez 2012;Gemenis 2013;Germann et al 2014;Rosema and Louwerse 2016).…”
Section: Theory and Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The article by Rosema and Louwerse () turns attention to VAA methodology, by analyzing a rather underresearched topic in the literature, namely, the effect of different answer scales on the voting advice provided to users. Their data derive from a VAA developed for the 2014 Dutch local elections.…”
Section: Outline Of the Special Issuementioning
confidence: 99%
“…As is the case with statement selection, party coding strategies and the choice of the matching algorithm, their article shows that answer scales matter—except for voters with an extremist response style. On the basis of their findings, Rosema and Louwerse () discuss the practical implications for VAA designers, suggesting that the voting advice should be presented as a preference list, rather than focusing on the “best match.”…”
Section: Outline Of the Special Issuementioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, more than 4m people used the StemWijzer before the 2012 elections in the Netherlands and more than 15m the Wahl-O-Mat ahead of the German national election in 2017. Research on VAAs has mostly dealt with their effects on political knowledge (Schultze 2014), issue voting (Ladner 2016), voter turnout (Fivaz and Nadig 2010;Marschall and Schultze 2012), electoral preferences (Mahéo 2016;Walgrave, van Aelst, and Nuytemans 2008;Kleinnijenhuis et al 2017) as well as with the impact of design choices on the recommendations given to voters (Germann et al 2015;Rosema and Louwerse 2016;Agathokleous and Tsapatsoulis 2016;Katakis et al 2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%