2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.tine.2019.100121
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Response suppression, strategy application, and working memory in the prediction of academic performance and classroom misbehavior: A neuropsychological approach

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Whereas for school children, there are highly replicated associations between neurocognitive performance and achievement, particularly for working memory [16,17], this result does not extend well to higher education [19,20]. One key difference is that students within different majors at university level are to a large extent self-selecting: students choose to study what they want to study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Whereas for school children, there are highly replicated associations between neurocognitive performance and achievement, particularly for working memory [16,17], this result does not extend well to higher education [19,20]. One key difference is that students within different majors at university level are to a large extent self-selecting: students choose to study what they want to study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Related to this, performance on neuropsychological tests, which also show significant variation even within the 'normal' population [15], are known to predict academic achievement. This has been particularly productive in regards to working memory in younger learners [16,17], but less successful within higher education, where long-term memory and behavioral regulation processes may be of more importance [18][19][20]. It is notable that associations with neuropsychological variables are seemingly always in the direction of lower test performance with lower academic achievement.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This finding suggests that cognitive control measures cannot account for gender disparities in academic achievement. Our findings also suggest that interference control and working memory are only tangentially associated with academic performance and that these correlations are ineffective at predicting academic performance variance over a three-year period (Dubuc, Leheudre, & Karelis, 2020;Pluck, Villagomez-Pacheco, Karolys, Montaño-Córdova, & Almeida-Meza, 2019).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 65%
“…The term EF refers to a family of top-down mental processes ( Diamond, 2013 ) and to the abilities needed for metacognitive control and direction of mental experience ( Lezak et al, 2004 ). EF is needed to concentrate and to pay attention ( Diamond, 2013 ) and is important for academic performance ( Pluck et al, 2019 ; Wang and Zhou, 2019 ; Dubuc et al, 2020 ). EF consists of capacities that enable a person to engage successfully in independent, purposive, self-directed, and self-serving behavior ( Lezak et al, 2004 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%