1982
DOI: 10.1111/j.1745-4549.1982.tb00650.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Response Surface Experimentation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
75
0
2

Year Published

1996
1996
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 132 publications
(78 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
1
75
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…A total of 30 different combinations including six replicates of the centre point each signed the coded value (0) were chosen in random order according to a CCRD configuration for three factors divided in three blocks (Cochran and Cox 1957). The α-values in the design outside the ranges were selected for rotability of the design (Thompson 1982). The experimental design in the coded (x) and actual (X) levels of variables is shown in Table 1.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A total of 30 different combinations including six replicates of the centre point each signed the coded value (0) were chosen in random order according to a CCRD configuration for three factors divided in three blocks (Cochran and Cox 1957). The α-values in the design outside the ranges were selected for rotability of the design (Thompson 1982). The experimental design in the coded (x) and actual (X) levels of variables is shown in Table 1.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Experimental design Response surface methodology (RSM) was adopted in the experimental design. A CCRD of three variables of three variables at three levels was used in D6 Hokes' response surface design (Thompson 1982) and design matrix is shown in Table 1.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The center point (the level combination in which the value of each coded variable was 0) was repeated five times for the three-variable design and was selected keeping the ingredients at levels expected to yield, at least, satisfactory experimental results. The overall acceptability (OAA) and texture were selected as the responses (Thompson 1982;Shyu and Hwang 2001).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%