Synthesis and Analysis Methods for Safety and Reliability Studies 1980
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4613-3036-3_16
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Response Surface Methodology in Risk Analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

1985
1985
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Both piping groups are rather flexible. The key difference is that the pseudostatic term in the total moment response plays a relatively greater role in piping group (3). This is evidenced by the coefficients of piping frequency, b f in Fig.…”
Section: Dampingmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Both piping groups are rather flexible. The key difference is that the pseudostatic term in the total moment response plays a relatively greater role in piping group (3). This is evidenced by the coefficients of piping frequency, b f in Fig.…”
Section: Dampingmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…In order to reduce calculation time, stochastic order response surface method (SRSM) is presented by using a polynomial type of function gðXÞ to replace the actual limit state function g(X). Typically a quadratic polynomial function without mixed terms is used as follows (Khuri and Cornell, 1996;Olivi, 1980;Rajashekhar and Ellingwood, 1993):…”
Section: 3mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to reduce calculation time, stochastic order response surface method (SRSM) is presented by using a polynomial type of function g¯ ( X ) to replace the actual limit state function g ( X ). Typically a quadratic polynomial function without mixed terms is used as follows (Khuri and Cornell, 1996; Olivi, 1980; Rajashekhar and Ellingwood, 1993): Equation 4 where n is the number of random variables X =[ x 1 , x 2 … x n ], and a 0 , b i , and c i are the 2 n +1 unknown coefficients. The unknown coefficients are obtained from discrete evaluations of the implicit limit state function, such as through evaluation of a FE routine.…”
Section: Fatigue‐based Reliability Assessment Of the Missile Suspension Structurementioning
confidence: 99%