2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.egyr.2022.08.222
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Response Surface Optimisation of Vertical Axis Wind Turbine at low wind speeds

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A twodimensional model tends to simplify the tridimensional structures that are characteristic of turbulent flows and does not consider the dissipative tridimensional vortices that are formed at the edges of the blades. As the works of Gosselin et al (2016) and Elsakka et al (2022) concluded, the lower the turbine's aspect ratio, the higher the tendency of the 2D simulations to overpredict the Cp, with up to 41% of overprediction observed by Elsakka et al (2022) for a turbine with aspect ratio equal to 1, close to the current turbine's aspect ratio of 1.2. Corroborating to that is the fact that the difference in Cp increases as the wind velocity increases and the flow becomes even more turbulent.…”
Section: Cfd Model Validationmentioning
confidence: 86%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A twodimensional model tends to simplify the tridimensional structures that are characteristic of turbulent flows and does not consider the dissipative tridimensional vortices that are formed at the edges of the blades. As the works of Gosselin et al (2016) and Elsakka et al (2022) concluded, the lower the turbine's aspect ratio, the higher the tendency of the 2D simulations to overpredict the Cp, with up to 41% of overprediction observed by Elsakka et al (2022) for a turbine with aspect ratio equal to 1, close to the current turbine's aspect ratio of 1.2. Corroborating to that is the fact that the difference in Cp increases as the wind velocity increases and the flow becomes even more turbulent.…”
Section: Cfd Model Validationmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…An overall increase of 12.7% in the power coefficient was observed with the optimal model, compared to the reference model. Elsakka et al (2022) aimed at implementing a response surface optimization (RSO) methodology for a VAWT operating at low wind speed conditions. Solidity, TSR and pitch angle were chosen as design parameters.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Response Surface is built using the updated DoE table, which illustrates the connection between the input and output parameters. The GDO method is used to determine optimal design options that meet both the target function and the design limitations [8]. In this study, the objective function is chosen to maximize the efficiency of the blade in order to increase energy production.…”
Section: The Rso Workflowmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…al. [14] used response surface optimization together with the multi-objective Genetic Algorithm (MOGA) in a CFD simulation to find optimal turbine solidity of 0.31 and blade pitch angle of 3.6. The 2D results show a minimal improvement of about 2.9% over the baseline turbine but when comparing 3D simulations, the added parameter of aspect ratio resulted in a significantly higher percentage improvement of about 34.5% with the winglet design increasing turbine efficiency even higher especially at lower AR values.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%