2006
DOI: 10.1109/tmag.2006.872018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Response surface space mapping for electromagnetic optimization

Abstract: An electromagnetic system can be described in a variety of ways. Coarse models provide fast evaluations but lack the required accuracy in the final stages of design. Fine models are highly accurate, but prohibitively expensive. Finding a compromise between these extremes may assist in overcoming bottlenecks in design automation and optimization. One approach is to carry out optimization in the coarse model space and use fine model simulations to fine-tune the result via space mapping. A new response surface sp… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This, in combination with the multipoint parameter extraction (4), ensures that (6) and (7) may be satisfied approximately. Moreover, condition (6) can be easily enforced by means of the output space mapping [3] using the surrogate (8) with obtained by (4) and (9) Numerical results presented in Section IV demonstrate that the trust-region-enhanced (output) space-mapping algorithm (8) and (9) indeed exhibits improvement over the standard algorithm.…”
Section: Trust-region Enhanced Space-mapping Algorithmmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…This, in combination with the multipoint parameter extraction (4), ensures that (6) and (7) may be satisfied approximately. Moreover, condition (6) can be easily enforced by means of the output space mapping [3] using the surrogate (8) with obtained by (4) and (9) Numerical results presented in Section IV demonstrate that the trust-region-enhanced (output) space-mapping algorithm (8) and (9) indeed exhibits improvement over the standard algorithm.…”
Section: Trust-region Enhanced Space-mapping Algorithmmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Design follows methodology described in Section IV, and it starts from x in ¼ [10,15,30,30,20,6,8,100, 100] T mm; its response is shown in Figure 7. The antenna models are evaluated with the CST MWS transient solver: the coarse-discretization model with 55,000 mesh cells at x in (evaluation time 110 seconds), and the fine model with 1,240,896 mesh cells at x in (evaluation time 100 minutes).…”
Section: B Dual-band Double-ring Antennamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Space mapping (SM) [6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17], tuning procedures [18][19][20][21][22], as well as various response correction methods [23,24] are examples of very efficient approaches of this kind used in microwave engineering.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%