2014
DOI: 10.1142/s0218810414200020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Response To: Beware the Volar Ulnar Fragment in a Comminuted Bartons Fracture

Abstract: We read with interest the article by Tan et al. 1 and agree that the AO 23 B3 fracture may re-displace following attempted volar plate fixation. In our experience the fracture posing the greatest challenge is a distal exiting fracture line with a small volar lip fragment. 2 Traditional volar plate design provides a more proximal buttress on the volar calcar to avoid plate prominence at the watershed line. In addition the AO 23 C.2 and C.3 fractures with comminution of the articular surface or metaphyseal commi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 2 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Rarely they were treated with a external fixator or a temporary 3.3 mm 16 hole distraction bridge plate spanning the fracture site and carpus[3]. Both of these techniques offer reliable fracture union, but unlike the volar rim plate, it is not possible to restore most aspects of distal radius anatomy as well as radio-carpal and distal radio-ulnar congruity.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Rarely they were treated with a external fixator or a temporary 3.3 mm 16 hole distraction bridge plate spanning the fracture site and carpus[3]. Both of these techniques offer reliable fracture union, but unlike the volar rim plate, it is not possible to restore most aspects of distal radius anatomy as well as radio-carpal and distal radio-ulnar congruity.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%