2021
DOI: 10.1289/ehp8820
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Response to “Comment on ‘A Quantile-Based g-Computation Approach to Addressing the Effects of Exposure Mixtures’”

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
(10 reference statements)
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…have since responded to that criticism defending their methods. 27 Similar to the Keil et al. findings when assessing unidirectional simulations, quantile g-computation is more powerful and less biased than the WQSBS_Split models in determining a mixture coefficient.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 56%
“…have since responded to that criticism defending their methods. 27 Similar to the Keil et al. findings when assessing unidirectional simulations, quantile g-computation is more powerful and less biased than the WQSBS_Split models in determining a mixture coefficient.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 56%
“…We fit four quantile g-computation models with SRS total raw score as the outcome and the 6 phthalate metabolites (i.e., ΣDEHP, MBP, MBzP, MCPP, MEP, and MiBP) as the independent variables. 39,40 Model 1 was a joint marginal structural model given by falsedouble-struckE(YXq|Z,ψ,η)=g(ψ0+ψ1Sq+ηZ) where falseY was SRS total raw score, falseXq was the phthalates decile, falseboldZ were the covariates, falseg() was a link function in a generalized linear model (e.g., the identity function in the case of a linear regression model for the expected value of falseY), falseψ0 was the model intercept, falseψ1 was the expected change in the outcome, given a one quantile increase in all exposures simultaneously, falseSq is an “index” that represented a joint value of the phthalates, and falseη was a set of model coefficients for the covariates …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Next, we calculated the weights of each phthalate within this mixture and defined as the proportion of the overall effects contributed by each phthalate in either the positive or negative direction. [39][40][41] These weights represented the contribution of the individual mixture components to the overall mixture effect. 42,43 Hence, the weight could range from -1 to 1, with all negative weights (i.e., negative partial mixture effects) summed to -1 and all positive weights (i.e., positive partial mixture effects) summed to 1.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The model without covariates is given by, gcomp differs in that WQS first estimates the weights 𝑤 𝑝 on the training data and then estimates 𝜓 and its p-value on the validation data based on the estimated weights; while Q-gcomp use all the data to estimate 𝛽 𝑝 and obtain 𝜓. We implement Q-gcomp via R package "qgcomp" (version 2.8.5) [47].…”
Section: Q-gcompmentioning
confidence: 99%