2016
DOI: 10.1101/039594
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Response to “Commentary on ‘Limitations of GCTA as a solution to the missing heritability problem”

Abstract: In a recent manuscript, Yang and colleagues criticized our paper, "Limitations of GCTA as a solution to the missing heritability problem". Here we show that their main claims are statistically invalid, and our results hold as stated.

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This difference is most likely a consequence of the GCTA method, which only estimates the proportion of variance explained by additive contributions from the genotyped SNPs, not the total heritability. However, the accuracy of the method has also been questioned due to the underlying assumption that may not always be true (33,34). Given this, and the large confidence intervals, the results should be interpreted with caution.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This difference is most likely a consequence of the GCTA method, which only estimates the proportion of variance explained by additive contributions from the genotyped SNPs, not the total heritability. However, the accuracy of the method has also been questioned due to the underlying assumption that may not always be true (33,34). Given this, and the large confidence intervals, the results should be interpreted with caution.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, recent studies have argued that estimation error associated with genetic similarity measurements and the ill-posedness of the empirical genetic similarity matrix may produce unstable and unreliable SNP heritability estimates [65]. However, this is an area under active investigation and debate [64][65][66][67]. Here, as the first study to screen all UK Biobank variables and provide an overview of the distribution of SNP heritability across different trait domains, and to examine the effect of potential modifying variables on heritability estimates, we used a straightforward and classical modeling approach that is most widely used.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lastly, as reviewed in [64], a number of empirical genetic similarity measurements computable from genome-wide SNP data have been proposed, which, when utilized in heritability analysis, can give different estimates with different interpretations. In addition, recent studies have argued that estimation error associated with genetic similarity measurements and the ill-posedness of the empirical genetic similarity matrix may produce unstable and unreliable SNP heritability estimates [65]. However, this is an area under active investigation and debate [64][65][66][67].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other related topics include gene-environment interaction, negative confounding between C and D factors, low power to detect C effects, heritability estimates from Genome-wide Complex Trait Analysis (GCTA), and finally epigenetic mechanisms. It is beyond the scope of this paper to address all these issues, but we refer the interested reader to some relevant literature (Boomsma et al, 2002;Canli & Lesch, 2007;Krishna Kumar et al, 2016;Moffitt et al, 2006;Petronis, 2010;Plomin et al, 2013;Tsankova et al, 2007;Yang et al, 2013).…”
Section: Equal Environment Assumption (Eea)mentioning
confidence: 99%