1979
DOI: 10.1016/s0006-3495(79)85185-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Response to "Comments on the Fluorescein Excitation and Emission Polarization Spectra in Living Cells"

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

1981
1981
1981
1981

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 9 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Udkoff and Norman (21) concluded that the intracellular fluorescein was partly bound to proteins. Cercek et al ( 4 ) argued that pH, polarity and viscosity vary between different microdomains in the cytoplasm, giving rise to several different solvation states of fluorescein with varying fluorescence characteristics (4). Their application of fluorochromasia in a cancer test (3) has given the nature of intracellular fluorescein binding new importance.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Udkoff and Norman (21) concluded that the intracellular fluorescein was partly bound to proteins. Cercek et al ( 4 ) argued that pH, polarity and viscosity vary between different microdomains in the cytoplasm, giving rise to several different solvation states of fluorescein with varying fluorescence characteristics (4). Their application of fluorochromasia in a cancer test (3) has given the nature of intracellular fluorescein binding new importance.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%