“…Figure 5 shows the reduction in rumen ammonia concentrations as related to CT concentration compared with CT-containing forages or non-CT-containing forages. Figure 5 implies that CT in forages significantly reduced rumen degradation of forage protein F I G U R E 2 Relationship between sheep and goats for ruminal dry matter (DM) digestibility (DMD) in response to feeding tannin-containing forages (Barry & Manley, 1984;Waghorn et al, 1987Waghorn et al, , 1990Waghorn, Douglas, Niezen, McNabb, & Foote, 1998;Waghorn, Tavendale, & Woodfield, 2002;Barahona, Lascano, Cochran, Morrill, & Titgemeyer, 1997;Woodward and Reed, 1997;Min et al, 2002aMin et al, ,b, 2012Bengaly et al, 2007;Yisehak et al, 2014) Goat Condensed tannins, % DM DM digesƟbility, % F I G U R E 3 Relationship between cow and goats for in vitro rumen digestibility in response to feeding various condensed tannin (CT)-containing browse species (Lyons, 2017 F I G U R E 4 Relationship between sheep and goats for ruminal nitrogen (N)-digestibility in response to feeding tannin-containing forages (Barry & Manley, 1984;Waghorn et al, 1987Waghorn et al, , 1990Waghorn et al, , 1998Waghorn et al, , 2002Barahona et al, 1997;Woodward and Reed, 1997;Min et al, 2002aMin et al, ,b, 2012Bengaly et al, 2007;Yisehak, Kibreab, Taye, Lourenço, & Janssens, 2016) Therefore, sheep and goats exhibited different levels of tolerance to the effects of CT (Narjisse, Elhonsali, & Olsen, 1995). Narjisse et al (1995) reported that addition of oak tannins (Quercus ilex leaves; 1 g of tannins/kg of BW) depressed ammonia levels in sheep, but not goats.…”