1996
DOI: 10.1080/j006v15n03_05
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Response to Dr. Coster's Critique of the Alberta Infant Motor Scale (AIMS)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
48
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(50 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
2
48
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Previous studies have reported similar findings concerning the course of gross motor development measured with the AIMS [6,10,[38][39][40]. The acceleration in the curve was as expected since motor development in infancy is faster than at any other time during life [41].…”
Section: Shape Of Gross Motor Curves and Factors Of Influencesupporting
confidence: 82%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Previous studies have reported similar findings concerning the course of gross motor development measured with the AIMS [6,10,[38][39][40]. The acceleration in the curve was as expected since motor development in infancy is faster than at any other time during life [41].…”
Section: Shape Of Gross Motor Curves and Factors Of Influencesupporting
confidence: 82%
“…VPT infants are at risk of developmental problems and identifying these problems makes early interventions possible [3][4][5]. Motor development is one of the markers to identify whether an infant is developing well and as such is one of the first signals to support clinical decision-making regarding starting early intervention [4,6]. However, the course of motor development for both preterm and term-born infants is known to be variable and non-linear, which makes predicting infant motor development and clinical decision-making difficult [7][8][9][10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, we found a high positive correlation (r = 0.59) between FA of the right posterior IFOF and the Alberta Infant Motor Scale (AIMS) 27 assessments around 3-4 months in eight subjects whose AIMS were available (Supplementary Fig. S7).…”
Section: Tract-based Analysismentioning
confidence: 85%
“…Control and Prevention (CDC) Developmental Assessment. 15,17,29 Because the exact definition of the evaluated milestones varies among these scales, we compared specific milestones that bear enough resemblance among the screening tests. For the THIS developmental scale, Denver II, and AIMS, failing to achieve a milestone was defined as not achieving the milestone at an age in which a 90% success rate was accomplished.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%