2015
DOI: 10.1111/ejh.12679
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Response to erythropoietic‐stimulating agents in patients with chronic myelomonocytic leukemia

Abstract: The CPSS and EPO levels are adequate tools to select CMML patients with symptomatic anemia who may benefit from treatment with ESA. A significant ER to ESA is expected in anemic patients with low/intermediate-1 CMML risk by the CPSS and a low endogenous serum EPO level.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Previous studies in MDS and chronic myelomonocytic leukemia have established that a lower EPO level is associated with superior responses to ESAs. 31,32 The findings in this study imply that the EPO level, specifically a cutoff of 200 IU/L, may have merit in predicting response to ESAs in AUE in addition to in MDS.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…Previous studies in MDS and chronic myelomonocytic leukemia have established that a lower EPO level is associated with superior responses to ESAs. 31,32 The findings in this study imply that the EPO level, specifically a cutoff of 200 IU/L, may have merit in predicting response to ESAs in AUE in addition to in MDS.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…Achievement of ER correlated with a better survival. 152 Challenging neutropenia is extremely infrequent in untreated CMML. Severe neutropenia in patients treated with cytoreductive drugs should be addressed by tapering and/or interrupting the drug.…”
Section: Treatmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In lower-risk CMML, treatment of anemia can rely on Erythropoiesis Stimulating Agents (ESAs) with MDS regimens [65], whereas thrombopoietin agonists seem more difficult to use, and still require prospective evaluation [66]. In patients with proliferative features, hydroxyurea remains a standard of care [2].…”
Section: Treatmentmentioning
confidence: 99%