2023
DOI: 10.1111/rec.14027
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Response to Gallagher (2022)—the Australian Tidal Restoration for Blue Carbon method 2022—conservative, robust, and practical

Catherine E. Lovelock,
Maria Fernanda Adame,
Sabine Dittmann
et al.

Abstract: The Blue Carbon Accounting Model (BlueCAM) is a tool for tidal restoration projects established under the Tidal Restoration for Blue Carbon method (2022) of the Australian voluntary carbon market. The commentary of Gallagher discussed that BlueCAM did not subtract allochthonous carbon, which is carbon in wetland soils from external sources, either terrestrial or marine sources, from estimated net abatement. This approach was used because all organic carbon preserved in a restored wetland soil, irrespective of … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 16 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This model is used within Australia's voluntary carbon market scheme and developed by a team of coastal scientists led by Lovelock (Lovelock et al 2023a). This critique was met with an adequate response from the creators of the BlueCAM in a response by Lovelock et al (2023Lovelock et al ( , 2023b. Regarding the focal points of the BlueCAM critique, Gallagher and Lovelock exchanged their very investigative arguments on the following five points:…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This model is used within Australia's voluntary carbon market scheme and developed by a team of coastal scientists led by Lovelock (Lovelock et al 2023a). This critique was met with an adequate response from the creators of the BlueCAM in a response by Lovelock et al (2023Lovelock et al ( , 2023b. Regarding the focal points of the BlueCAM critique, Gallagher and Lovelock exchanged their very investigative arguments on the following five points:…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%