2019
DOI: 10.1002/chem.201801785
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Response to “Impact of Zeolite Structure on Entropic–Enthalpic Contributions to Alkane Monomolecular Cracking: An IR Operando Study”

Abstract: This is a response to the paper published by S. A. Kadam, H. Li, R. F. Wormsbacher, A. Travert, Chem. Eur. J. 2018, 24, 5489. Key consistencies between our reported results and those reported in this work are also highlighted.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…One should note, however, that similar variations in intrinsic activation enthalpy have been qualified as constant or not constant, from one set of work to the other. 513 More recently, a similar decomposition exercise was undertaken by Travert and co-workers following a fully experimental approach. 474,497 They developed an operando IR system, which allowed them to monitor the alkane coverage of the acid sites at temperatures of around 673 K while at the same time recording the cracking rates (from propane to n-heptane) on MFI, CHA, FER, and TON zeolites.…”
Section: Internal Versus Terminal C−c Bond Crackingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…One should note, however, that similar variations in intrinsic activation enthalpy have been qualified as constant or not constant, from one set of work to the other. 513 More recently, a similar decomposition exercise was undertaken by Travert and co-workers following a fully experimental approach. 474,497 They developed an operando IR system, which allowed them to monitor the alkane coverage of the acid sites at temperatures of around 673 K while at the same time recording the cracking rates (from propane to n-heptane) on MFI, CHA, FER, and TON zeolites.…”
Section: Internal Versus Terminal C−c Bond Crackingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Janda et al assign this inconsistency to the need of considering adsorption parameters at the Brønsted acid sites only, as done in their Monte Carlo approach, and not within the whole zeolite, as done in traditional adsorption measurements. One should note, however, that similar variations in intrinsic activation enthalpy have been qualified as constant or not constant, from one set of work to the other …”
Section: Monofunctional Transformation Of Alkanesmentioning
confidence: 99%