1964
DOI: 10.1016/0014-4827(64)90142-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Response to injury in the lens epithelium of the bullfrog (Rana catesbeiana)*1

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

1965
1965
2001
2001

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example a wound in the anterior lens capsule of the rabbit was shortly followed by a band of cells in DNA synthesis and mitosis moving outwards from the injury site (Harding and Srinivasan, 1961). The spatial patterns of proliferative responses also appear to vary between species; for example in the frog lens the cells responding to a similar needle injury were randomly distributed (Rothstein, Weinsieder and Blaiklock, 1964). Inter-species variations in the temporal and spatial distribution, and expression, of local regulatory factors may account for such differences.…”
Section: Table IImentioning
confidence: 96%
“…For example a wound in the anterior lens capsule of the rabbit was shortly followed by a band of cells in DNA synthesis and mitosis moving outwards from the injury site (Harding and Srinivasan, 1961). The spatial patterns of proliferative responses also appear to vary between species; for example in the frog lens the cells responding to a similar needle injury were randomly distributed (Rothstein, Weinsieder and Blaiklock, 1964). Inter-species variations in the temporal and spatial distribution, and expression, of local regulatory factors may account for such differences.…”
Section: Table IImentioning
confidence: 96%
“…In earlier works we suggested proliferation in the lens may be triggered by low-cell population density [Rothstein et al, 1964[Rothstein et al, , 1965, Upon mechanical injury, cells migrate into the wound focus and consequently leave an area in which the cell number is reduced. This condition may well act as a trigger for mitosis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To test the underlying assumption more directly, mitosis was artificially stimulated by needle injury. This gives rise to increased numbers of division figures 4 days later (at 24°C) [Rothstein et al, 1964], When animals with wounded lenses were placed at 4 °C the counts were reduced from 185.4 ± 62 to 13.4 ± 3 figures. The lower number of figures, it is to be noticed, is comparable to that seen in some of the uninjured lenses a t4 nC.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%