“…One gap in this area of research is valid screening procedures for writing difficulties. Technically adequate screening measures are required if schools plan to use response to intervention (RTI, McMaster, Parker, & Jung, ; Saddler & Asaro‐Saddler, ) models to identify and provide more intensive instruction for students who may be at risk for writing difficulties. In this study, we investigate screening procedures for identifying writing difficulties of students during first grade.…”
Section: Students With Writing Difficultymentioning
Early identification of students who are at risk for writing difficulties is an important first step in improving writing performance. First grade students (N = 150) were administered a set of early writing measures and reading measures in January. Sentence Writing Quality and Oral Reading Fluency demonstrated strong classification accuracy when a Teacher Rating was used to identify which students had writing difficulties (AUC > .90), and the combined measures yielded sensitivity and specificity indices exceeding 0.90. The combined reading and writing measures yielded AUCs of a higher magnitude than those associated with individual measures when norm‐referenced writing subtests were used to identify which students had writing difficulties (AUC in .80 range). The findings suggest that it may be possible to accurately identify which students may be at risk for writing difficulties within first grade.
“…One gap in this area of research is valid screening procedures for writing difficulties. Technically adequate screening measures are required if schools plan to use response to intervention (RTI, McMaster, Parker, & Jung, ; Saddler & Asaro‐Saddler, ) models to identify and provide more intensive instruction for students who may be at risk for writing difficulties. In this study, we investigate screening procedures for identifying writing difficulties of students during first grade.…”
Section: Students With Writing Difficultymentioning
Early identification of students who are at risk for writing difficulties is an important first step in improving writing performance. First grade students (N = 150) were administered a set of early writing measures and reading measures in January. Sentence Writing Quality and Oral Reading Fluency demonstrated strong classification accuracy when a Teacher Rating was used to identify which students had writing difficulties (AUC > .90), and the combined measures yielded sensitivity and specificity indices exceeding 0.90. The combined reading and writing measures yielded AUCs of a higher magnitude than those associated with individual measures when norm‐referenced writing subtests were used to identify which students had writing difficulties (AUC in .80 range). The findings suggest that it may be possible to accurately identify which students may be at risk for writing difficulties within first grade.
“…Typically primary school children's writing is evaluated in response to a written, spoken or pictorial probe and these texts are then scored to capture the children's competence in written text production. Irrespective of the approach taken writing assessments are needed to provide information about the pupils' current level of performance and future teaching and learning needs and the teacher or the researcher is required to make explicit decisions about the dimension(s) of the text which are to be evaluated (Saddler & Asaro-Saddler, 2013). …”
“…There is a lack of research on how to frame writing within an RTI model (Saddler & Asaro-Saddler, 2013). Hughes and Dexter (2011) examined 13 field studies to examine RTI efficacy.…”
Section: Response To Interventionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Little focus has been placed on screening, monitoring progress, and designing and evaluating effective writing interventions (McAlenney & McCabe, 2012). One overriding reason for this is that additional research is still needed to identify a writing measure that can accurately identify students with writing difficulties (Saddler & Asaro-Saddler, 2013).…”
Section: Scoring Approachesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The response to intervention (RTI) model may be used to implement and monitor evidence based interventions with students that are having difficulty meeting the core standards. Even though there is an extensive research base in writing, little research discusses how to frame writing within an RTI model (Saddler & Asaro-Saddler, 2013). Fuchs (2004) stated that curriculum based measurement might be the tool used within RTI frameworks, but additional research is needed.…”
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.