2019
DOI: 10.1111/inm.12638
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Response to Luakanen et al.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 5 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The editorials were inconsistent in their use of post‐nominals with only one (Redona, Jackson, Woods, & Usher, 2019) clearly indicating the first author was a nurse. Of the responses/letters, four indicated there was a nurse on the team and two that there was a MHN on the team (Muir‐Cochrane, 2019; Scholz & Happell, 2019). As illustrated in Figure 1 where there was at least one declared MHN as an author (36% of papers), there was the highest rate of reference to MHNs (86%, mean MHNs = 14.7).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The editorials were inconsistent in their use of post‐nominals with only one (Redona, Jackson, Woods, & Usher, 2019) clearly indicating the first author was a nurse. Of the responses/letters, four indicated there was a nurse on the team and two that there was a MHN on the team (Muir‐Cochrane, 2019; Scholz & Happell, 2019). As illustrated in Figure 1 where there was at least one declared MHN as an author (36% of papers), there was the highest rate of reference to MHNs (86%, mean MHNs = 14.7).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%