2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijosm.2020.07.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Response to: Models and theoretical frameworks for osteopathic care - A critical view and call for updates and research

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Concerning the different considerations of the concept of SD found in the included studies, it should be mentioned that, in 2020, authors from outside the U.S., i.e., the European, Australasian and Brazilian communities of practice, published their contributions to a debate about osteopathic conceptual models, including the concept of SD [ 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 , 42 , 43 , 44 , 45 , 46 ]. On one hand, Esteves et al mentioned SD as a non-relevant clinical entity [ 26 ]; on the other hand, different authors discussed updating the concept and renovating the old theoretical substrate, not necessarily removing it [ 27 , 29 , 30 , 42 , 43 , 44 , 45 , 46 , 47 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Concerning the different considerations of the concept of SD found in the included studies, it should be mentioned that, in 2020, authors from outside the U.S., i.e., the European, Australasian and Brazilian communities of practice, published their contributions to a debate about osteopathic conceptual models, including the concept of SD [ 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 , 42 , 43 , 44 , 45 , 46 ]. On one hand, Esteves et al mentioned SD as a non-relevant clinical entity [ 26 ]; on the other hand, different authors discussed updating the concept and renovating the old theoretical substrate, not necessarily removing it [ 27 , 29 , 30 , 42 , 43 , 44 , 45 , 46 , 47 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Concerning the different considerations of the concept of SD found in the included studies, it should be mentioned that, in 2020, authors from outside the U.S., i.e., the European, Australasian and Brazilian communities of practice, published their contributions to a debate about osteopathic conceptual models, including the concept of SD [ 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 , 42 , 43 , 44 , 45 , 46 ]. On one hand, Esteves et al mentioned SD as a non-relevant clinical entity [ 26 ]; on the other hand, different authors discussed updating the concept and renovating the old theoretical substrate, not necessarily removing it [ 27 , 29 , 30 , 42 , 43 , 44 , 45 , 46 , 47 ]. They claimed that it is possible to gain a conceptual osteopathic approach that uses SD as a reconditioned model by implementing new evidence-based knowledge, such as allostasis and interoception, involving (en) active model and strategies, integrating patient-centred communication, shared decision-making self-management, and educational coaching [ 27 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These structure-function models are used in combination to assess the relevance of somatic dysfunction (or palpatory findings, respectively), prioritize treatment approaches, and guide diagnosis and treatment ( Grace et al, 2016 ; Tamburella et al, 2019 ). However, the usefulness and plausibility of these models have been recently critically debated within the profession ( Alvarez et al, 2020 ; Bettelli et al, 2020 ; Esteves et al, 2020 ; Lunghi and Liem, 2020 ; Ménard et al, 2020 ; Nesi, 2020 ; Sampath and Fairs, 2020 ; Santiago et al, 2020 ; Steel et al, 2020a ).…”
Section: Osteopathymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To address these barriers requires some educational strategies to contribute meaningfully to the attitudes of future professionals with new models and theoretical frameworks for osteopathic care [65]. To shape a professional identity [66] as a personcentred living tradition of care [67] with specific strategies by the worldwide community of practice depends on whether osteopathy is regulated at an academic level [68] or not [69]. It must positively consider the rich diversity of practice and education as a piece of the puzzle [70], finding a way between osteopathic principles and evidence [57].…”
Section: J O U R N a L P R E -P R O O Fmentioning
confidence: 99%