2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.amepre.2006.04.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Response to Overdose Among Injection Drug Users

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

8
50
0
1

Year Published

2008
2008
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 59 publications
(59 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
8
50
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Although drug overdoses are largely preventable, overdose prevention education programs remain in their infancy and inappropriate witness responses to overdose are common (Pollini et al 2006;Sergeev et al 2003;Tobin et al 2005;Tracy et al 2005). Programs in the US cities of New York, San Francisco, Chicago, Baltimore, and elsewhere have provided overdose prevention education and provision of naloxone--an injectable opiate antagonist that can immediately reverse an opiate overdose and prevent overdose death-to IDUs in an effort to prevent overdose morbidity and mortality (Maxwell et al 2006;Piper et al 2007;Seal et al 2005).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Although drug overdoses are largely preventable, overdose prevention education programs remain in their infancy and inappropriate witness responses to overdose are common (Pollini et al 2006;Sergeev et al 2003;Tobin et al 2005;Tracy et al 2005). Programs in the US cities of New York, San Francisco, Chicago, Baltimore, and elsewhere have provided overdose prevention education and provision of naloxone--an injectable opiate antagonist that can immediately reverse an opiate overdose and prevent overdose death-to IDUs in an effort to prevent overdose morbidity and mortality (Maxwell et al 2006;Piper et al 2007;Seal et al 2005).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The reluctance of OPP training participants and drug users to call 911 for medical assistance in overdose situations has been observed in other cities and regions. 10,15,[18][19][20] However, the percentage of incidents in which 911 was or was not called varies across study populations and cities. For example, one Baltimore study that focused on overdose experiences of 924 IDUs (without a naloxone component) found that 911 was called in roughly two-thirds of the incidents.…”
Section: Overdose Prevention and Naloxone Distribution In Pittsburghmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…For example, one Baltimore study that focused on overdose experiences of 924 IDUs (without a naloxone component) found that 911 was called in roughly two-thirds of the incidents. 19 Another Baltimore study of 397 current or former drug users (without a naloxone component) who had witnessed an overdose reported that emergency services were called in 23% of the cases. 18 A recent New York City study looking at the responses of drug users who had participated in an overdose prevention training program (with naloxone prescription) to overdose events found emergency services were called in 74% of the incidents.…”
Section: Overdose Prevention and Naloxone Distribution In Pittsburghmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…12,13 In a Baltimore study, 37 % of injection drug users who did not call 911 during an overdose endorsed concerns about police as the most important reason they did not call. 13 Several states have enacted laws, commonly called Good Samaritan laws, to encourage calling 911 during overdoses on controlled substances; these laws are in part modeled on college campus alcohol Good Samaritan policies. 14 Overdose Good Samaritan laws had been adopted in ten states as of the end of 2012, but they have not yet been evaluated.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%